ارزیابی روش‌های صنعتی و متداول ساختمان به منظور توسعه فنّاوری ترکیبی آنها در پروژه‌های مسکونی

مقالات آماده انتشار

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
آوا نیکمرد 1
رضا سامه 2
سید عبدالحمید بهشتی روی 3
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد معماری، گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی (ره)، قزوین، ایران.
2 عضو هیأت علمی گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام‌خمینی (ره)، قزوین، ایران.
3 مدیرعامل و نایب رئیس هیئت مدیره، شرکت ملّی ساختمان، تهران، ایران.
10.22034/he.2026.573878.1196
چکیده
در دنیای کنونی که همزمان کیفیت معماری، سرعت اجرا و پایداری عملکرد ساختمان‌ها مورد پیگیری هستند، انتخاب روش ساخت مناسب به یکی از چالش‌های کلیدی در فرآیند طراحی و ساخت مسکن بدل شده است. هر کدام از روش‌های ساخت صنعتی، متداول و ترکیبی، دارای ویژگی‌ها، مزایا و محدودیت‌هایی هستند که بر کیفیت و عملکرد بلندمدّت بنا تأثیرگذارند. با توجّه به اهمیت همزمان کیفیت، سرعت و پایداری، فقدان یک مبنای تحلیلی دقیق برای ارزیابی جامع و سیستماتیک روش‌های ساخت، فرآیند انتخاب بهینه را با ابهامات فراوانی روبرو ساخته است و این امر ضرورت این پژوهش را برجسته می‌کند. نوآوری مقاله در اائه یک چارچوب تحلیلی منسجم برای سنجش همزمان سه بعد «طراحی، اجرا و نگهداری» است. این پژوهش ابتدا از منظر روش با راهبرد تحقیق تطبیقی، شاخص‌های تخصّصی را در سه حوزه‌ی مذکور استخراج کرده است؛ سپس با تبدیل طیف کیفی به مقادیر کمّی، فرآیند کدگذاری و ارزیابی در دو مرحله‌ی درون‌گروهی و مقایسه‌ی نهایی شاخص‌های مشترک صورت گرفت. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد در ارزیابی جامع شاخص‌های عملکردی، «روش ترکیبی صنعتی» جایگاه برتر را کسب کرده و کارآمدی بالاتری در مقایسه با «روش ترکیبی متداول» نتایج تحلیل‌ها نیز حاکی از آن است اگرچه روش‌های صنعتی در معیارهای دقّت، کیفیت و سرعت عملیات پیشرو هستند اما در مؤلّفه‌هایی همچون انعطاف‌پذیری، با محدودیت مواجه‌اند. در نهایت، این مقاله تکیه بر یک رویکرد ترکیبی بهینه را پیشنهاد می‌دهد؛ تلفیق روش‌های ساخت متداول و صنعتی می‌تواند راهکاری متوازن برای پاسخ‌گویی به نیازهای چندجانبه‌ی پروژه‌های مسکونی در آینده فراهم آورد و ضمن ارتقاء کیفیت و دوام بنا، سرعت اجرا را نیز افزایش دهد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
ساخت صنعتی
فناوری‌های نوین صنعتی
ساخت متداول
ساخت ترکیبی
مسکن معاصر
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of the Industrial & Conventional Construction Methods in order to Development of their Hybrid Technology in Residential Projects

نویسندگان English

Ava Nikmard 1
Reza Sameh 2
Seyed Abdolhamid Beheshti Rouy 3
1 Master Student of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture & Urbanism, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.
2 Faculty Member of the Architecture Department, Faculty of Architecture & Urbanism, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.
3 CEO & Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, National Construction Company, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

In today’s context, where architectural quality, construction speed, and the sustainability of building performance have simultaneously gained significant importance, selecting an appropriate construction method has become one of the major challenges in the design and housing construction process. Industrialized, conventional, and hybrid construction methods each possess distinct characteristics, advantages, and limitations that influence the quality and long-term performance of buildings. Given the concurrent importance of quality, speed, and sustainability, the lack of a precise analytical basis for evaluating construction methods has made the optimal selection process ambiguous, underscoring the need for this research. The innovation of this paper lies in the development of an integrated analytical framework for the simultaneous assessment of the three dimensions of “design, construction, and maintenance.” Using a comparative research strategy, this study identified specialized indicators within the aforementioned domains. Subsequently, by transforming qualitative spectra into quantitative values, the coding and evaluation processes were conducted in two stages: intra-group assessment and the final comparison of shared indicators. The results of the analyses indicate that, in the comprehensive evaluation of performance indicators, the “industrial hybrid method” achieved the highest ranking and demonstrated greater efficiency compared to the “conventional hybrid method.” The findings further reveal that although industrialized construction methods excel in precision, quality, and execution speed, they face limitations in areas such as flexibility. Ultimately, the paper proposes reliance on an optimized hybrid approach. The integration of conventional and industrial construction methods can provide a balanced solution to the multifaceted demands of contemporary residential projects while improving building quality and durability and accelerating construction.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Industrial Construction
Advanced Industrial Technologies
Conventional Construction
Hybrid Construction
Contemporary Residential Projects
1.      Agapiou, A. (2021). Increasing the prevalence of offsite construction in housing association developments: Conceptual and pragmatic challenges. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202112.0168.v1
2.      Al-Aidrous, A. H. M. H., Rahmawati, Y., Wan Yusof, K., Omar Baarimah, A., & Alawag, A. M. (2021). Review of industrialized buildings experience in Malaysia: An example of a developing country. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 682(1), 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/682/1/012003
3.      Alhawamdeh, M., & Lee, A. (2024). A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the barriers of offsite construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(12), 1087–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2024.2397287
4.      Allaei, A., Yazdanfar, S., Hosseini, S., & Norouzian-Maleki, S. (2022). The significant indicators for the assessment of social sustainability in housing. Soffeh, 30(1), 5–26.                            https://doi.org/10.29252/soffeh.30.1.5
5.      Altuwaim, A., AlTasan, A., & Almohsen, A. (2023). Success criteria for applying construction technologies in residential projects. Sustainability, 15(8), 6854. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086854
6.      Andersson, N., & Lessing, J. (2017). The interface between industrialized and project-based construction. Procedia Engineering, 196, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.193
7.      Badameh Golvardy, A., & Ghorbani, H. (2022). Application of 3D printing in modern construction industry. In The 6th International Conference and the 2nd National Conference on Architecture, Urban Development and Sustainable Environment, Hamadan
8.      Bayat, M. and Taherkhani, F. (2016). Investigation on comparing conventional and industrial construction method with the perspective of cost and time. Journal of engineering and construction management, 1(1), 29-33.
9.      Dashti, F. (2021). Technology of building construction and industrialization. Andisheh Asr Publishing.
10.   Gunawardena, T., & Mendis, P. (2022). Prefabricated building systems design and construction. Encyclopedia, 2(1), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2010006
11.   Ho, C., Kim, Y.-W., & Zabinsky, Z. B. (2022). Prefabrication supply chains with multiple shops: Optimization for job allocation. Automation in Construction, 136, 104155.                https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104155
12.   Hossein Alipour, M., & Haghighi, H. (2011). A strategy for the industrialization of construction in the 20-year vision (A feasibility study of using light steel frame [LSF] technology in constructions in Tehran). Rahbord, 19(57, Special Section on Economic Studies), 325–339.
13.   Islam, M. M., Prodhan, R. K., Shoriful, M., & Morshed, A. (2025). Robotics and automation in construction management review: Focus on the application of robotics and automation technologies in construction. Journal of Novel Engineering Science, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.70937/jnes.v2i01.63
14.   Jin, R., Hong, J., & Zuo, J. (2020). Environmental performance of off-site constructed facilities: A critical review. Energy and Buildings, 207, 109567 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109567
15.   Knaack, U., Chung-Klatte, S., & Hasselbach, R. (2012). Prefabricated systems: Principles of construction. Birkhäuser Architecture.
16.   Mofolasayo, A. (2023). A framework for the evaluation of the decision between onsite and offsite construction using life cycle analysis (LCA) concepts and system dynamics modeling. World Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.31586/wjcea.2023.569
17.   Motamedi, M. (2019). The basic of industrialization of buildings and comparison with common manufacturing methods. Arna Publishing.
18.   Ofori-Kuragu, J. K., Osei-Kyei, R., & Wanigarathna, N. (2022). Offsite construction methods—What we learned from the UK housing sector. Infrastructures, 7(12), 164.                   https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7120164
19.   Olia, J., Taghdiri, A., & Ghanbarzadeh Qomi, S. (2010). Structural compatibility of industrial construction systems. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU), 1(1), e61920.
20.   https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2010.61920
21.   Pasand, F. (2019). Prefabricated elements and modular components. Simaye Danesh Publishing.
22.   Patel, J., & Kaushal, V. (2024). Comparative review study of modular construction with traditional on-site construction. Preprints.
23.   Peiris, A., Hui, F. K. P., Duffield, C., & Ngo, T. (2023). Production scheduling in modular construction: Metaheuristics and future directions. Automation in Construction, 150, 104851.
24.   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104851
25.   Pervez, H., Ali, Y., & Petrillo, A. (2021). A quantitative assessment of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from conventional and modular construction: A case of developing country. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, 126210. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272448
26.   Pervez, H., Ali, Y., Pamucar, D., Garai-Fodor, M., & Csiszárik-Kocsir, Á. (2022). Evaluation of critical risk factors in the implementation of modular construction. PLOS ONE, 17(8), e0272448. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272448
27.   Podder, A., Pless, S., Rothgeb, S., Klammer, N., Blazek, C., Louis, J., & Rashid, K. (2020). Integrating energy efficiency strategies with industrialized construction for our clean energy future: Preprint. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings.
28.   Puthawala, S., Pal, N., & Shah, P. (2022). Sustainable building technologies (E. Beitaf, A. Beitaf, & F. Abbasi, Trans.). Tahan Gostar Publishing.
29.   Richard, R.-B. (2017). Industrialized building system categorization. In R. Smith & A. Quale (Eds.), Offsite architecture (pp. 18–XX). Routledge.
30.   Rocha, P. F., Ferreira, N. O., Pimenta, F., & Pereira, N. B. (2023). Impacts of prefabrication in the building construction industry. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 28–45.                                  https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010003
31.   Rojas-Herrera, C., Martínez-Soto, A., Avendaño-Vera, C., Carrasco, R. C., & Barbato, N. R. (2025). Industrialized construction: A systematic review of its benefits and guidelines for the development of new constructive solutions applied in sustainable projects. Applied Sciences, 15(5), 2308.
32.   Salama, T., Salah, A., & Moselhi, O. (2017). Configuration of hybrid modular construction for residential buildings. International Journal of Innovation Management and Technology, 8(2), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijimt.2017.8.2.712
33.   Shahbazi, Y., & Pakravan, F. (2021). The role of robotics in prefabrication and its advantages and barriers in the industry. Green Architecture Journal, 5(27), 27–32.
34.   Shibani, A., Agha, A., Hassan, D., Al-Hadeethi, Y., & Choudhury, M. (2021). Effectiveness of the modern methods of construction in terms of cost and time: A case study of the United Kingdom. Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 11(1), 19–28    https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jce.20211101.03
35.   Sotorrío Ortega, G., Cobo Escamilla, A., & Tenorio Ríos, J. A. (2023). Industrialized construction and sustainability: A comprehensive literature review. Buildings, 13(11), 2861.
36.    https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112861
37.   Sutrisna, M., Ramnauth, V., & Zaman, A. (2020). Towards adopting off-site construction in housing sectors as a potential source of competitive advantage for builders. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(3), 165–183.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2020.1807306
38.   Taghdiri, A., & Ghanbarzade Ghomi, S. (2016). Advantages of prefabrication construction in comparison with conventional construction. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 8(15), 15–25
39.   Thurairajah, N., Rathnasinghe, A., Ali, M., & Shashwat, S. (2023). Unexpected challenges in the modular construction implementation: Are UK contractors ready? Sustainability, 15(10), 8105.
40.   https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108105
41.   Tsz Wai, C., Wai Yi, P., Ibrahim Olanrewaju, O., Abdelmageed, S., Hussein, M., Tariq, S., & Zayed, T. (2021). A critical analysis of benefits and challenges of implementing modular integrated construction. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(4), 656–668.
42.    https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1907525
43.   Vafamehr, M. (2012). Modern materials and advanced construction methods. Chapar Publishing.
44.   Wang, S., Wang, Z., & Ruan, Y. (2023). Prefabricated concrete components combination schemes selection based on comprehensive benefits analysis. PLOS ONE, 18(7), e0288742.
45.   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288742
46.   Wu, Z., Luo, L., Li, H., Wang, Y., Bi, G., & Antwi-Afari, M. F. (2021). An analysis on promoting prefabrication implementation in construction industry towards sustainability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11493.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111493
47.   Wuni, I. Y., & Shen, G. Q. (2019). Critical success factors for modular integrated construction projects: A review. Building Research & Information, 48(7), 763–784.                                  https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2019.1669009
48.   Zohourian, M., Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., & Almaskati, D. (2025). Modular construction: A comprehensive review. Buildings, 15(12), 2020.   https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15122020
 
اکولوژی انسانی

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 19 خرداد 1405