ارائه مدل ریاضی برای انتخاب استراتژی مناسب جهت حل مساله لجستیک با درنظر گرفتن مصرف انرژی

نوع مقاله : مقاله مستخرج از رساله دکتری

نویسندگان
گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران.
10.22034/he.2026.588501.1238
چکیده
با افزایش پیچیدگی زنجیره‌های تأمین و ضرورت کاهش هزینه‌ها و مصرف انرژی، طراحی مدل‌های یکپارچه برای برنامه‌ریزی تولید، توزیع و لجستیک اهمیت ویژه‌ای یافته است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائه یک مدل ریاضی جامع برای انتخاب استراتژی مناسب حل مسائل لجستیک چهارسطحی با در نظر گرفتن مصرف انرژی انجام شده است. مدل پیشنهادی چهار سطح تأمین‌کنندگان، تولیدکنندگان، انبارها و مشتریان را به‌صورت یکپارچه در برگرفته و به‌طور هم‌زمان تصمیمات مربوط به برنامه‌ریزی تولید، مدیریت موجودی، مکان‌یابی، مسیریابی ناوگان ناهمگن، ظرفیت تولید و انبار، پنجره‌های زمانی، ساعات اضافه‌کاری و تخفیف‌های خرید را مدل‌سازی می‌کند. با توجه به ماهیت NP-Hard مسئله، برای حل نمونه‌های کوچک و متوسط از نرم‌افزار GAMS و برای مسائل بزرگ از الگوریتم فراابتکاری چندهدفه NSGA-II استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که الگوریتم NSGA-II در مسائل کوچک با انحراف کمتر از ۳ درصد نسبت به پاسخ‌های GAMS عمل کرده و در تابع هدف محدودیت زمانی نرم، نتایجی کاملاً منطبق ارائه داده است. همچنین در مسائل بزرگ، این الگوریتم ضمن کاهش قابل‌توجه زمان محاسبات، پاسخ‌های باکیفیت و متنوعی تولید کرد. در مجموع، مدل پیشنهادی می‌تواند با کاهش هزینه‌های زنجیره تأمین و مصرف انرژی، کارایی برنامه‌ریزی تولید، توزیع و لجستیک را بهبود داده و ابزار مناسبی برای تصمیم‌گیری در مسائل پیچیده زنجیره تأمین باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Presenting a mathematical model for selecting the appropriate option to solve the lag problem, considering energy consumption

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Reza Alijani
Reza Ehtesham Rasi
Sadegh Abedi
Department of Industrial Management, Qa.C., Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
چکیده English

With the increasing complexity of supply chains and the growing need to reduce operational costs and energy consumption, the development of integrated models for production planning, distribution, and logistics has become increasingly important. This study proposes a comprehensive mathematical model for selecting an appropriate solution strategy for a four-echelon logistics problem while considering energy consumption. The proposed model integrates four supply chain levels, including suppliers, manufacturers, warehouses, and customers, and simultaneously addresses production planning, inventory management, facility location, heterogeneous vehicle routing, production and warehouse capacity, time windows, overtime scheduling, and supplier discount policies. Owing to the NP-hard nature of the problem, GAMS software was employed to solve small- and medium-sized instances, whereas the multi-objective metaheuristic algorithm NSGA-II was applied to large-scale problems. The results demonstrated that, for small-sized instances, the NSGA-II algorithm achieved solutions with less than 3% deviation from the optimal solutions obtained by GAMS, while producing identical results for the soft time-window objective function. For large-scale instances, NSGA-II significantly reduced computational time while maintaining high-quality and diverse Pareto-optimal solutions. Overall, the proposed model effectively improves production planning, distribution, and logistics performance by reducing total supply chain costs and energy consumption, providing an efficient decision-support tool for solving complex supply chain optimization problems.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Four-level supply chain
multi-objective optimization
NSGA-II algorithm
GAMS software
logistics
  1. Alzate, P., Isaza, G. A., Toro, E. M., & Jaramillo-Garzón, J. A. (2024). Advances and emerging research trends in maritime transport logistics: Environment, port competitiveness and foreign trade. International Journal of Production Management and Engineering, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4995/ijpme.2024.21090
  2. Yuan, W., Li, Q., & Wang, Y. (2024). Collaborative multicenter vehicle routing problem with time windows and mixed deliveries and pickups. Computers and Operations Research, 197, 116690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2023.116690
  3. Bektaş, S., & Laporte, G. (2020). Integrated production scheduling and distribution planning with time windows. In Lean and Green Supply Chain Management (pp. 231–252). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35533-7_10
  4. Kim, J., & Doolen, T. (2022). Robust optimization model for closed-loop supply chain planning under reverse logistics flow and demand uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129831
  5. Lasch, R., & Janker, C. (2020). Production planning and scheduling in multi-factory production networks: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 2028–2054. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1657242
  6. Farahani, P., Meier, O., & Özgüven, E. (2019). Integrated production and distribution planning for perishable food products. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 24, 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-019-09350-5
  7. Sadati, M. E. H., & Çatay, B. (2021). A hybrid variable neighborhood search approach for the multi-depot green vehicle routing problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 149, 102293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102293
  8. Ahmed Zainul Abideen, S., Sundram, V. P. K., & Banu, A. (2023). Collaborative insights on horizontal logistics to integrate supply chain planning and transportation logistics planning: A systematic review and thematic mapping. Transport Policy, 92, 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.100066
  9. Zhao, N., Hao, J., & Xu, Y. (2023). Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model. International Journal of Production Economics, 259, 108817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108817
  10. Wu, T., & Sun, Z. (2020). Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition for the facility location and production planning problem. Omega, 124, 105068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.105068
  11. Tsao, Y.-C., & Zhang, C. (2018). Designing sustainable supply chain networks under uncertain environments: Fuzzy multi-objective programming. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.067
  12. Kuo, R. J., Egbu, E. A., & Hu, H. (2023). Applying NSGA-II to vehicle routing problem with drones considering makespan and carbon emission. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 221, 119777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.119777
  13. Smerichevska, S. V., Prodanova, L., & Yakushev, O. (2024). Digitization of logistics and supply chain management. Intellectualization of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 26, 113–123.
  14. Shi, H., Zhang, Q., & Qin, J. (2024). Cold chain logistics and joint distribution: A review of fresh logistics modes. Systems, 12(7), 264. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/12/7/264
  15. Batarlienė, N., & Jarašūnienė, A. (2024). Improving the quality of warehousing processes in the context of the logistics sector. Sustainability, 16(6), 2595. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2595
  16. Khan, K. A., Ma, F., Akbar, M. A., Islam, M. S., Ali, M., & Noor, S. (2024). Reverse logistics practices: A dilemma to gain competitive advantage in manufacturing industries of Pakistan with organization performance as a mediator. Sustainability, 16(8), 3223. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3223
  17. Liu, S., Zhuang, X., Yan, L., Wang, Y., Wu, S., Lv, Y., ... & Wang, F. Y. (2024). A parallel logistic network simulation method and system to improve logistics efficiency. IEEE Journal of Radio Frequency Identification, 8, 580–591. https://er.chdtu.edu.ua/handle/ChSTU/5202
  18. Becerra, P., Martin, J., & López, J. (2021). Green supply chain quantitative models for sustainable inventory management: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 328, 129544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129544

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 02 مرداد 1405