Investigating the effect of radar images in classifying land use classes in machine learning based algorithms

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 M.Sc. Graduate, Water Research Institute (Ministry of Energy)
2 Assistance Professor, Water Research Institute (Ministry of Energy) , Tehtan, Iran
3 Graduate, Water Research Institute (Ministry of Energy) , Tehtan, Iran
4 , M.Sc. Graduate, Water Research Institute (Ministry of Energy) , Tehtan, Iran
5 . Graduate, Water Research Institute (Ministry of Energy) , Tehtan, Iran
10.22034/el.2023.392546.1011
Abstract
Acquiring knowledge about the types of land uses and the stages of their change provides basic and very important information to researchers and decision makers. One of the most common and useful methods in remote sensing is to access the maximum information contained in satellite data by combining radar and optical satellite images. In general, the main purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the presence of SAR images in the classification of optical multi-temporal satellite images in machine learning-based classification algorithms, including random forest, Cart Decision Tree and Support Vector Machine. In the above paper, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) dataset, along with slope layers, a digital elevation model and a corrected Sentinel-2 satellite image was supervised by the three methods mentioned. Once again, this was done with the presence of the Sentinel-1 satellite SAR image database. Finally, in the post-processing stage, the individual pixels were connected to neighboring classes. This was done by majority filtering. The final results were validated with ground data. The results showed that in the study of all classes, the overall accuracy and kappa coefficient in the presence of SAR dataset and for all three classification methods improved by only 3%, but in the one-to-one study of the classes, the producer accuracy of the random forest method in the dual agriculture class improved. It has been significant and its value has increased from 0.74 to 0.84. In the support vector machine method, dry farming and orchard classes have had a more significant improvement, which have increased from 0.75 and 0.78 to 0.84 and 0.92, respectively. Finally, it can be said that the addition of radar images to the classification has a positive and significant effect only in the mentioned classes, and also the obvious advantage of the random forest method compared to other methods is quite obvious.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. اسماعیل نژاد، رضا، کامران زینال زاده. 2020. ارزیابی تغییرات کاربری اراضی با استفاده از سنجش از دور و سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی در زیرحوضه نازلوچای،مجله مدیریت خاک و تولید پایدار 9(4): 159–72.
  2. پروندی، آیدا, امیرشاهرخ امینی. 1398. بررسی روش های تلفیق تصاویر سنجش از دور در سطح پیکسل.” https://civilica.com/doc/911446/certificate/print/ (October 26, 2022).
  3. سعید محمودیزاده، علی اسماعیلی. 1399. روشی نوین در بهبود نتایج آشکارسازی تغییرات با تلفیق تصاویر اپتیک و رادار و بکارگیری روشی بدون نظارت و مبتنی بر الگوریتم POS.فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی 29(116): 7–25.
  4. شریفی کیا، محمد، جلال کرمی، احسان فلاحتی. 2020. قابلیت سنجی کارآمدی روش‌های ترکیب و تلفیق داده های رادار و اپتیک با هدف شناسایی مناطق دگرسانی. فصلنامه علمی علوم زمین 30(117): 65–74.
  5. شکری، محمد، محمودرضا صاحبی. 2017. تلفیق تصاویر رادار با روزنه مجازی و اپتیک با استفاده از تبدیل کرولت. نشریه علمی علوم و فنون نقشه برداری 7(2): 127–38.
  6. صی محمدی، سمیره بررسی روند تغییرات کاربری اراضی در حوزه‌ی آبخیز دشت ماهیدشت با استفاده از تصاویر سنجش از دور. پایداری، توسعه و محیط زیست 2(2): 53–70.
  7. لقمان خداکرمی ، علیرضا سفیانیان . کاربرد سنجش از دور چند زمانی در تعیین سطح زیرکشت. نشریه علوم آب و خاک. ۱۳۹۱; ۱۶ (۵۹) :۲۱۵-۲۳۱.
  8. محمد دشتی مرویلی ، بهنام کامکار ، حسین کاظمی. 1400. مقایسه شاخص های گیاهی در تخمین زیست‌توده بقایای. پژوهش های حفاظت آب و خاک 27(6): 121–36.
  9. Basaeed, Essa, Harish Bhaskar, and Mohammed Al-Mualla. 2012. “Beyond Pan-Sharpening: Pixel-Level Fusion in Remote Sensing Applications.” 2012 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology, IIT 2012: 139–44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261454003_Beyond_pan-sharpening_Pixel-level_fusion_in_remote_sensing_applications (October 26, 2022).
  10. Dubovyk, Olena et al. 2015. “Monitoring Vegetation Dynamics with Medium Resolution MODIS-EVI Time Series at Sub-Regional Scale in Southern Africa.” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 38(1): 175–83. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271274076_Monitoring_vegetation_dynamics_with_medium_resolution_MODIS-EVI_time_series_at_sub-regional_scale_in_southern_Africa (October 26, 2022).
  11. Hall, D L, and S A H McMullen. 2004. “Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion.” Library 2: 466. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=531406 (October 26, 2022).
  12. Lopes, Mailys et al. 2020. “Combining Optical and Radar Satellite Image Time Series to Map Natural Vegetation: Savannas as an Example.” Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 6(3): 316–26.
  13. Pierdicca, Nazzareno, Marco Chini, and Fabrizio Pelliccia. 2014. “The Contribution of SIASGE Radar Data Integrated with Optical Images to Support Thematic Mapping at Regional Scale.” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 7(7): 2821–33.
  14. Sarzynski, Thuan, Xingli Giam, Luis Carrasco, and Janice Ser Huay Lee. 2020. “Combining Radar and Optical Imagery to Map Oil Palm Plantations in Sumatra, Indonesia, Using the Google Earth Engine.” Remote Sensing 2020, Vol. 12, Page 1220 12(7): 1220. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/7/1220/htm (October 26, 2022).
  15. Sobrino, Jose A., and Yves Julien. 2013. “Trend Analysis of Global MODIS-Terra Vegetation Indices and Land Surface Temperature between 2000 and 2011.” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 6(5): 2139–45.
  16. Wang, Hongyan et al. 2014. “Assessment of Land Degradation Using Time Series Trends Analysis of Vegetation Indictors in Beijing-Tianjin Dust and Sandstorm Source Region.” International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS): 753–56.
  17. Wang, Sisi et al. 2016. “Validation and Trend Analysis of ECV Soil Moisture Data on Cropland in North China Plain during 1981–2010.” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 48: 110–21.
  18. Zhang, Hongsheng, Hui Lin, and Yu Li. 2015. “Impacts of Feature Normalization on Optical and SAR Data Fusion for Land Use/Land Cover Classification.” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 12(5): 1061–65.