ارتباط بین معماری و سلامت روانی ساکنان شهری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
بهروز نصیری
دانشجوی دکتری معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران.
10.22034/el.2024.476770.1027
چکیده
معماری شهری به عنوان یک عنصر کلیدی در طراحی فضاهای زندگی، تأثیر عمیقی بر سلامت روانی ساکنان دارد. فضاهای شهری، با ویژگی‌های خاص خود، می‌توانند به احساس آرامش یا اضطراب در افراد منجر شوند. از جمله عواملی که می‌تواند بر سلامت روانی تأثیر بگذارد، می‌توان به نور طبیعی، دسترسی به فضاهای سبز، طراحی فضاهای عمومی و همچنین کیفیت صدا و آلودگی هوا اشاره کرد. به عنوان مثال، فضاهای سبز و پارک‌ها نه تنها فرصت‌هایی برای تفریح و فعالیت‌های بدنی فراهم می‌کنند، بلکه به کاهش استرس و اضطراب نیز کمک می‌کنند. مطالعات نشان داده‌اند که زندگی در نزدیکی فضاهای سبز می‌تواند به بهبود خلق و خو و کاهش علائم افسردگی منجر شود. همچنین، طراحی معمارانه فضاهایی که امکان تعامل اجتماعی را فراهم می‌کنند، می‌تواند به تقویت روابط اجتماعی و احساس تعلق به جامعه کمک کند که از عوامل کلیدی در سلامت روانی محسوب می‌شود. علاوه بر این، طراحی فضاهای شهری باید به نیازهای روانی ساکنان توجه کند. فضاهای شلوغ و بی‌نظم می‌توانند احساس بی‌قراری و ناامنی ایجاد کنند، در حالی که فضاهای منظم و آرام می‌توانند احساس راحتی و امنیت را تقویت کنند. به عنوان مثال، خیابان‌های عریض با درختان سایه‌دار و نورپردازی مناسب می‌توانند فضایی دلپذیر و آرامش‌بخش برای پیاده‌روی و تفریح ایجاد کنند. همچنین، وجود امکاناتی مانند کافه‌ها و رستوران‌ها در فضاهای عمومی می‌تواند به ایجاد نقاط دید و تعاملات اجتماعی کمک کند. در نهایت، توجه به اصول طراحی انسانی و نیازهای روانی ساکنان در معماری شهری می‌تواند به بهبود کیفیت زندگی و سلامت روانی آن‌ها منجر شود. به همین دلیل، معماران و طراحان شهری باید به طور جدی به این موضوع توجه کنند و تلاش کنند تا فضاهایی را ایجاد کنند که نه تنها زیبا و جذاب باشند، بلکه تأثیر مثبتی بر سلامت روانی ساکنان داشته باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Relationship Between Architecture and Urban Residents' Mental Health

نویسنده English

Nasiri Behrooz
Ph,D Student of Architecture,Faculty of Art and Architecture,Mashhad Branch,Islamic Azad University,Mashhad,Iran
چکیده English

Urban architecture, as a key element in the design of living spaces, has a profound impact on the mental health of residents. Urban spaces, with their specific characteristics, can lead to feelings of calm or anxiety in individuals. Factors that can influence mental health include natural light, access to green spaces, the design of public areas, as well as noise quality and air pollution. For instance, green spaces and parks not only provide opportunities for recreation and physical activities, but they also help reduce stress and anxiety. Studies have shown that living near green spaces can improve mood and reduce symptoms of depression. Moreover, architecturally designed spaces that facilitate social interaction can strengthen social relationships and foster a sense of belonging to the community, which are key factors in mental health. Additionally, urban space design should consider the psychological needs of residents. Crowded and chaotic spaces can create feelings of restlessness and insecurity, while orderly and calm spaces can enhance feelings of comfort and safety. For example, wide streets with shaded trees and appropriate lighting can create a pleasant and relaxing environment for walking and leisure. Furthermore, the presence of amenities such as cafes and restaurants in public spaces can contribute to the creation of focal points and social interactions. Ultimately, attention to human-centered design principles and the psychological needs of residents in urban architecture can lead to an improvement in their quality of life and mental health. Therefore, architects and urban planners should seriously consider this issue and strive to create spaces that are not only beautiful and attractive but also have a positive impact on residents' mental health.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Urban architecture
living space design
mental health
urban spaces
  1. Schreyer, R.; Jacobs, G.R.; White, R.G. Environmental meaning as a determinant of spatial behaviour in recreation. In Proceedings of Applied Geography Conferences; Department of Geography, State University of New York: New York, NY, USA, 1981; Volume 4, pp. 294–300.
  2. Williams, D.R.; Roggenbuck, J.W. Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. In Proceedings of the NRPA Symposium on Leisure Research, San Antonio, TX, USA, 20–22 October 1989; Volume 9.
  3. Kyle, G.; Graefe, A.; Manning, R.; Bacon, J. Effects of place attachment on users’ perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting. J. Environ. Psychol. 2004, 24, 213–225. 
  4. Murgaš, F.; Klobučník, M. Does the quality of a place affect well-being? Ekológia 2016, 35, 224–239. 
  5. Petrovič, F.; Murgaš, F. Description relationship between urban space and quality of urban life. A geographical approach. Land 2021, 10, 1337. 
  6. Murgaš, F.; Petrovič, F.; Tirpáková, A. Quality of place as the winner of the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of quality of life. Will this knowledge strengthen the development of geographical psychology? Heliyon 2024, 10, e26261. 
  7. Faka, A.; Kalogeropoulos, K.; Maloutas, T.; Chalkias, C. Urban quality of life: Spatial Modeling and indexing in Athens metropolitan area, Greece. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 347. 
  8. Faka, A.; Kalogeropoulos, K.; Maloutas, T.; Chalkias, C. Spatial variability and clustering of quality of life at local level: A geographical analysis in Athens, Greece. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 276. 
  9. Ittelson, W.H. Environmental perception and urban experience. Environ. Behav. 1978, 10, 193–213. 
  10. McGrath, J.E. (Ed.) The Social Psychology of Time; Sage: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 1988.
  11. McGrath, J.E.; Kelly, J.R. Time and Human Interaction; Guilford: New York, NY, USA, 1986.
  12. Von Wirth, T.; Grêt-Regamey, A.; Moser, C.; Stauffacher, M. Exploring the influence of perceived urban change on residents’ place attachment. J. Environ. Psychol. 2016, 46, 67–82. 
  13. Manzo, L.; Devine-Wright, P. Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications; Routledge: London, UK, 2013.
  14. Hu, M.; Chen, R. A Framework for Understanding Sense of Place in an Urban Design Context. Urban Sci. 2018, 2, 34. 
  15. Sebastien, L. The power of place in understanding place attachments and meanings. Geoforum 2020, 108, 204–216. 
  16. Buttimer, A. Home, reach, and the sense of place. In The Human Experience of Space and Place; Buttimer, A., Seamon, D., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2015; pp. 166–187.
  17. Altman, I. Some perspectives on the study of man-environment phenomena. Represent. Res. Soc. Psychol. 1973, 4, 109–126.
  18. Moore, G.T. Research, design and evaluation for people-in-environments. In Introduction to Architecture; Snyder, J.C., Catanese, A.J., Eds.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1979.
  19. Moore, G.T.; Tuttle, D.P.; Howell, S.C. Environmental Design Research Directions: Process and Prospects; Greenwood: Westport, CN, USA, 1985.
  20. Scannell, L.; Gifford, R. Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010, 30, 1–10. 
  21. Lewicka, M. Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? J. Environ. Psychol. 2011, 31, 207–230. 
  22. Hoefer, W.; Vicenzotti, V. Post-industrial landscapes: Evolving concepts. In The Routledge Companion to Landscape Studies; Howard, P., Thompson, I., Waterton, E., Atha, M., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2013; pp. 423–434.
  23. Schwab, K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution; Penguin Books Limited: London, UK, 2017.
  24. Xu, M.; David, J.M.; Kim, S.H. The fourth industrial revolution: Opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Financ. Res. 2018, 9, 90–95. 
  25. High, S. Deindustrialisation and its consequences. In Routledge International Handbook of Working-Class Studies; Fazio, M., Launius, C., Strangleman, T., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2020; pp. 169–179.
  26. Cugurullo, F. Exposing Smart Cities and Eco-Cities: Frankenstein Urbanism and the Sustainability Challenges of the Experimental City. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 2018, 50, 73–92. 
  27. Cugurullo, F. Frankenstein Urbanism: Eco, Smart and Autonomous Cities, Artificial Intelligence and the End of the City; Routledge: London, UK, 2021.
  28. Elmqvist, T.; Andersson, E.; Frantzeskaki, N.; McPhearson, T.; Olsson, P.; Gaffney, O.; Takeuchi, K.; Folke, C. Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nat. Sustain. 2019, 2, 267–273. 
  29. Camboim, G.F.; Zawislak, P.A.; Pufal, N.A. Driving elements to make cities smarter: Evidences from European projects. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 142, 154–167. 
  30. Yigitcanlar, T.; Foth, M.; Kamruzzaman, M. Towards post-anthropocentric cities: Reconceptualising smart cities to evade urban ecocide. J. Urban Technol. 2019, 26, 147–152. 
  31. Goldsmith, S.; Crawford, S. Responsive City: Engaging Communities through Data-Smart Governance; John Wiley & Sons: London, UK, 2014.
  32. Foth, M.; Brynskov, M.; Ojala, T. Citizen’s Right to the Digital City: Urban Interfaces, Activism, and Placemaking; Springer: Singapore, 2015; pp. v–ix. 
  33. Tuan, Y.F. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience; Edward Arnold: London, UK, 1977.
  34. Tuan, Y.-F. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1974.
  35. Altman, I.; Low, S. Place Attachment, Human Behavior and Environments: Advances in Theory and Research; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1992; Volume 12.
  36. Stedman, R.C. Sense of place and forest science: Toward a program of quantitative research. For. Sci. 2003, 49, 822–829. 
  37. Jorgensen, B.S.; Stedman, R.C. Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. J. Environ. Psychol. 2001, 21, 233–248. 
  38. Canter, D. The Psychology of Place; Architectural Press: London, UK, 1977.
  39. Shamai, S. Sense of place: An empirical measurement. Geoforum 1991, 22, 347–358. 
  40. Steele, F. The Sense of Place; CBI Publishing Company, Inc.: Boston, MA, USA, 1981.
  41. Hummon, D. Community Attachment: Local Sentiment and Sense of Place. In Place Attachment, Human Behavior and Environments: Advances in Theory and Research; Altman, I., Low, S., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1992; pp. 253–278.
  42. Canter, D. The facets of place. In Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design; Volume 4: Toward the Integration of Theory, Methods, Research, and Utilisation; Moore, G.T., Marans, R.W., Eds.; Plenum: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 109–147.
  43. Mesch, G.S.; Manor, O. Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environ. Behav. 1998, 30, 504–519. 
  44. Proshansky, H.H.; Fabian, A.K.; Kaminoff, R. Place-identity: Physical world socialisation of the self (1983). In The People, Place, and Space Reader; Gieseking, J.J., Mangold, W., Katz, C., Low, S., Saegert, S., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2014; pp. 111–115.
  45. Riley, R. Attachment to the ordinary landscape. In Place Attachment; Altman, I., Low, S., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1992; pp. 13–36.
اکولوژی انسانی
دوره 2، شماره 4
پاییز 1402
صفحه 293-303