تحلیل الگوی مکانی کیفیت زندگی شهری در شهر تبریز با استفاده از TOPSIS-DANP

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
سید کمیل صالحی کمامردخی 1
فائزه کریم زاده 2
سیدعلیرضا سجادی 3
1 استادیار گروه مدیریت دولتی و مدیریت شهری، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.
2 کارشناسی ارشد برنامه ریزی شهری، گروه برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر ایران، تهران، ایران.
3 کارشناس ارشد طراحی شهری، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد ایران.
10.22034/el.2025.507112.1063
چکیده
ارزیابی کیفیت زندگی شهری برای برنامه‌ریزی شهرها امری حیاتی است، اما در تحلیل‌های جزئی فضایی درون شهری یک شکاف اطلاعات مکانی وجود دارد. به این منظور که همواره کیفیت زندگی را با ابعاد اجتماعی و اقتصادی معرفی شده است اما در این پژوهش به بررسی کیفیت زندگی بر مبنای شاخص های مکانی توجه شده است. این مطالعه این شکاف را برای شهر تبریز با ارزیابی الگوهای فضایی کیفیت زندگی در محلات مختلف از طریق ادغام نوآورانه تکنیک چندمعیاره تاپسیس-دانپ با تحلیل خودهمبستگی فضایی Moran's I ، مرتفع می‌سازد. بر این اساس، شاخصی ترکیبی با استفاده از 15 شاخص محیط ساخته شده، اجتماعی- اقتصادی و زیست محیطی نظیر فضای سبز، آموزش، بهداشت و کیفیت هوا ساخته شد. رتبه بندی و وزن دهی TOPSIS-DANP با لحاظ نظرات کارشناسان انجام گرفت که بر اساس آن، شاخص‌های سرانه تسهیلات و تجهیزات شهری (0851/0) و کاربری اراضی بهداشتی سرانه (0842/0) دارای بیشترین ارزش و فاصله از گسل (0426/0) و تراکم ساختمانی (0401/0) دارای کمترین وزن هستند. افزون بر این، با استفاده از آزمون Moran's I، خوشه‌بندی آماری معنادار نمرات کیفیت زندگی شناسایی شد که نشانگر وجود نابرابری‌های درون شهری قابل توجهی از نظر دسترسی به خدمات، زیرساخت‌ها و کیفیت محیط زیست بین محلات است. تحلیل های به دست آمده مناطق با امتیاز های بالایا پایین را مشخص کرده است و مداخلات سیاستی در جهت بهبود کیفیت زندگی را آشکار ساخته است. در نهایت، یافته‌های این مقاله نشان می‌دهد که رویکرد تحلیل فضایی یکپارچه، بینش جامعی از الگوهای کیفیت زندگی در سطح محلات تبریز ارائه می‌دهد. بر این مبنا، مناطق فاقد فضای سبز و محیط زیست سالم به عنوان مهمترین اولویت‌ ارتقای استاندارد پایدار زندگی شهری شناسایی شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Analysis of the spatial pattern of urban quality of life in Tabriz city using TOPSIS-DANP

نویسندگان English

Seyed Komeil Salehi Komamardakhi 1
Faezeh Karimzadeh 2
Seyedalireza Sajjadi 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Public and Urban Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Master’s degree in Urban Planning, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Art, Tehran, Iran.
3 Master of Urban Design, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran,
چکیده English

Assessing the quality of urban life is crucial for city planning, but there is a spatial information gap in detailed spatial analyses of urban areas. For this purpose, quality of life has always been introduced with social and economic dimensions, but in this study, attention has been paid to examining quality of life based on spatial indicators. This study bridges this gap for the city of Tabriz by assessing spatial patterns of quality of life in different neighborhoods through an innovative integration of the multi-criteria TOPSIS-DANP technique with Moran's I spatial autocorrelation analysis. Accordingly, a composite index was constructed using 15 built environment, socio-economic and environmental indicators such as green space, education, health and air quality. TOPSIS-DANP ranking and weighting were carried out taking into account the opinions of experts, based on which the indicators of per capita urban facilities and equipment (0.0851) and per capita sanitary land use (0.0842) have the highest value and distance from fault (0.0426) and building density (0.0401) have the lowest weight. In addition, using Moran's I test, statistically significant clustering of quality of life scores was identified, indicating the existence of significant intra-urban inequalities in terms of access to services, infrastructure, and environmental quality between neighborhoods. The resulting analyses identified areas with high and low scores and revealed policy interventions to improve quality of life. Finally, the findings of this paper indicate that the integrated spatial analysis approach provides a comprehensive insight into quality of life patterns at the neighborhood level of Tabriz. On this basis, areas lacking green space and a healthy environment were identified as the most important priority for improving the sustainable standard of urban life.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Quality of urban life
spatial analysis
TOPSIS-DANP
Moran'
s I
Tabriz
  1. Afroj, S., Hanif, F., Bin Hossain, F., Fuad, N., Islam, I., Sharmin, N., & Siddiq, F. (2021). Assessing the municipal service quality of residential neighborhoods based on SERVQUAL, AHP and Citizen’s Score Card: A case study of Dhaka North City Corporation area, Bangladesh. Journal of Urban Management, 10(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2021.03.001
  2. Airiken, M., Zhang, F., Weng Chan, N., & Kung, H. (2022). Assessment of spatial and temporal ecological environment quality under land use change of urban agglomeration in the North Slope of Tianshan, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 12282–12299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16579-3
  3. Alizadeh, M., Alizadeh, E., Asadollahpour Kotenaee, S., Shahabi, H., Beiranvand Pour, A., Panahi, M., ... & Saro, L. (2018). Social vulnerability assessment using artificial neural network (ANN) model for earthquake hazard in Tabriz city, Iran. Sustainability, 10(10), 3376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103376
  4. Alvarez, A., & Müller-Eie, D. (2017). Quality of urban life and its relationship to spatial conditions. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 223(25), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC170251
  5. Asadi, A., & Akbari, E. (2020). Spatial analysis of quality of life in urban areas using geographic information system (GIS) (Case study: District 2 of Mashhad). Journal of Geographical Studies, 20(58), 35–52. (In Persian). http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/jgs.20.58.35
  6. Azizi, P., Soltani, A., Bagheri, F., Sharifi, S., & Mikaeili, M. (2022). An integrated modelling approach to urban growth and land use/cover change. Land, 11(10), 1715. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101715
  7. Badland, H., Whitzman, C., Lowe, M., Davern, M., Aye, L., Butterworth, L., Hes, D., & Giles-Corti, B. (2014). Urban liveability: Emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health. Social Science & Medicine, 111, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.003
  8. Bastanian Shahgoli, M., Panahi, A., & Abdollahzadeh Taraf, A. (2018). Evaluating the indicators of urban life quality in old and new textures of Tabriz (Case study: Koch-e Bagh and Marzdaran). Journal of Sociology Studies, 10(39), 73–89. (In Persian). https://journals.iau.ir/article_541372.html
  9. Bednaříková, Z., Bavorova, M., & Ponkina, E. V. (2016). Migration motivation of agriculturally educated rural youth: The case of Russian Siberia. Journal of Rural Studies, 45, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.006
  10. Bibri, S. E., Krogstie, J., & Kärrholm, M. (2020). Compact city planning and development: Emerging practices and strategies for achieving the goals of sustainability. Developments in the Built Environment, 4, 100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2020.100021
  11. Bolzan Wesz, J., Gomes Miron, L., Delsante, L., & Tzortzopoulos, P. (2023). Urban quality of life: A systematic literature review. Urban Science, 7(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci7020056
  12. Chen, W., Lu, X., Yan, H., & Du, X. (2023). Decision tree of indicator benchmark: A hybrid method for assessing cities’ performance through urban indicators and benchmark. Ecological Indicators, 154, 110804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110804
  13. Cilluffo, A., & Ruiz, N. G. (2019). World population growth is expected to nearly stop by 2100. Pew Research Center. https://pewrsr.ch/2WJzNHf
  14. Constantinescu, M., Orîndaru, A., Căescu, S. C., & Pachit, anu, A. (2019). Sustainable development of urban green areas for quality of life improvement—Argument for increased citizen participation. Sustainability, 11(18), 4868. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184868
  15. Das, D. (2008). Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research, 88(2), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9191-6
  16. El Din, H. S., Shalaby, A., Farouh, H. E., & Elariane, S. A. (2013). Principles of urban quality of life for a neighborhood. HBRC Journal, 9(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.02.007
  17. Feizizadeh, B., Ronagh, Z., Pourmoradian, S., Gheshlaghi, H. A., Lakes, T., & Blaschke, T. H. (2021). An efficient GIS-based approach for sustainability assessment of urban drinking water consumption patterns: A study in Tabriz city, Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society, 64, 102584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102584
  18. Frank, L. D., Sallis, J. F., Saelens, B. E., Leary, L., Cain, K., Conway, T. L., & Hess, P. M. (2010). The development of a walkability index: Application to the neighborhood quality of life study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 44(13), 924–933. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701
  19. Garau, C., & Pavan, V. M. (2018). Evaluating urban quality: Indicators and assessment tools for smart sustainable cities. Sustainability, 10(3), 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030575
  20. Ghanbari, A., Karimzadeh, S., & Taraneh, S. (2022). Evaluating the quality of urban life using remote sensing and GIS—Case study: District number 1 and 2 of Zahedan. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR), 31(121), 93–110. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2022.252771
  21. Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., ... & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812–818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383
  22. Guo, R., Ann Diehl, J., Zhang, R., & Wang, H. (2024). Spatial equity of urban parks from the perspective of recreational opportunities and recreational environment quality: A case study in Singapore. Landscape and Urban Planning, 247, 105065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105065
  23. Haeffner, M., Jackson-Smith, D., Buchert, M., & Risley, J. (2017). Accessing blue spaces: Social and geographic factors structuring familiarity with, use of, and appreciation of urban waterways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 167, 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.008
  24. Hayek, U. W., Efthymiou, D., Farooq, B., von Wirth, T., Teich, M., Neuenschwander, N., & Grêt-Regamey, A. (2015). Quality of urban patterns: Spatially explicit evidence for multiple scales. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.010
  25. Hazrati, M. H., Ahmadzadeh, H., & Panahi, A. (2023). Measuring the impact of urban tourism development on the quality of life in the urban areas residents of Tabriz metropolis. Urban Economics and Planning, 4(3), 142–157. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/uep.2023.419807.1415
  26. Hosingholizade, A., Jelokhani-Niaraki, M., Argany, M., & Hosseini, A. (2022). Analysis of urban quality of life in neighborhoods areas with emphasis on comparative methodological approaches; The case study on district 6 of Tehran. Sustainable City, 4(4), 35–52. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2021.280352.1445
  27. Li, G., & Weng, Q. (2007). Measuring the quality of life in city of Indianapolis by integration of remote sensing and census data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600735624
  28. Mandeli, K. (2019). Public space and the challenge of urban transformation in cities of emerging economies: Jeddah case study. Cities, 95, 102409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102409
  29. Marans, R. W., & Stimson, R. (2011). An overview of quality of urban life. In Investigating quality of urban life: Theory, methods, and empirical research (pp. 1–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1742-8_1
  30. Metwally, E., & Samir, E. (2024). Assessing citizen satisfaction indicators for urban public services to enhance quality of life in Sharm el-Sheikh. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102841
  31. Mohammadi, A., Karimzadeh, S., Valizadeh Kamran, K., & Matsuoka, M. (2020). Extraction of land information, future landscape changes and seismic hazard assessment: A case study of Tabriz, Iran. Sensors, 20(24), 7010. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247010
  32. Mouratidis, K. (2021). Urban planning and quality of life: A review of pathways linking the built environment to subjective well-being. Cities, 115, 103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103229
  33. Parviznejad, P. S., & Akhavan, A. N. (2021). Impact of the tourism industry scenarios in urban economy: (Case study Tabriz). International Journal of Innovation in Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.52547/ijimes.1.1.1
  34. Petrovic, F., & Murgaš, F. (2021). Description relationship between urban space and quality of urban life: A geographical approach. Land, 10(12), 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121337
  35. Porter, M. (2015). The competitive advantage of the inner city. In The city reader (pp. 358–371). Routledge. https://cricketanddrains.pbworks.com/f/Competitive+Inner+City.pdf
  36. Sapena, M., Wurm, M., Taubenbock, H., Tuia, D., & Ruiz, L. A. (2021). Estimating quality of life dimensions from urban spatial pattern metrics. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 85, 101549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101549
  37. Wang, P., Li, L., & Wang, Y. (2023). The index construction and evaluation of quality of life in China and its spatial mismatch with subjective well-being: Evidence from a city level perspective. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03228-0
  38. Wesz, J. G. B., Miron, L. I. G., Delsante, I., & Tzortzopoulos, P. (2023). Urban quality of life: A systematic literature review. Urban Science, 7(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci7020056
  39. Węziak-Białowolska, D. (2016). Quality of life in cities – Empirical evidence in comparative European perspective. Cities, 58, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.016
  40. Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities “just green enough.” Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
  41. Wu, W., Tan, W., Wang, R., & Chen, W. Y. (2023). From quantity to quality: Effects of urban greenness on life satisfaction and social inequality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 238, 104843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104843
  42. Zeynali Azim, A., Rezai, B., Farji, S., & Rafizadeh, M. (2023). Measuring the social indicators of the quality of urban life with a micro-scale in Tabriz. Urban Economics and Planning, 4(2), 34–51. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/uep.2023.390715.1341
  43. Zhang, J. X., Cheng, J. W., Philbin, S. P., Ballesteros-Perez, P., Skitmore, M., & Wang, G. (2023). Influencing factors of urban innovation and development: A grounded theory analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(3), 2079–2104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02151-7
اکولوژی انسانی
دوره 4، شماره 11
تابستان 1404
صفحه 1099-1114