کاربرد اصول معماری دایره‌ای در بهینه‌سازی مصرف سوخت در ساختمان‌های مسکونی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
امید زمانی 1
امیررضا بهبهانی 2
1 کارشناسی ارشد معماری، علوم ساختمان، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
2 کارشناسی ارشد معماری، علوم ساختمان، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی ، تهران، ایران.
10.22034/he.2025.550734.1147
چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف بررسی کاربرد اصول معماری دایره‌ای در بهینه‌سازی مصرف سوخت فسیلی در ساختمان‌های مسکونی ایران، از طریق رویکرد کیفی پدیدارشناختی انجام شد. داده‌ها با استفاده از مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته با ۱۵ معمار حرفه‌ای از شهرهای تهران، اصفهان، تبریز و شیراز، جمع‌آوری و با روش تحلیل تماتیک و نرم‌افزار NVivo تحلیل شدند. یافته‌ها چهار تم اصلی را شناسایی کردند: موانع اجرایی (هزینه‌های بالا، کمبود دانش فنی، مقاومت فرهنگی)، فرصت‌های نوآورانه (ادغام الگوهای سنتی مانند خشت و بادگیر، نوآوری‌های دیجیتال، همکاری بین‌رشته‌ای)، تأثیر عملی (کاهش ۲۰-۳۰٪ مصرف گاز، پایداری بلندمدت، کاهش ۱۵-۲۵٪ انتشار CO₂)، و راهکارهای پیشنهادی (آموزش، تحقیق محلی، مشارکت جامعه). الگوی پارادایمی Strauss و Corbin (۱۹۹۸) نشان داد که فرصت‌ها پدیده مرکزی (بهینه‌سازی مصرف سوخت) را تقویت می‌کنند، اما موانع آن را تعدیل می‌کنند، و راهکارها این تعدیل را مدیریت می‌کنند. این اصول با کاهش وابستگی به سوخت‌های فسیلی، به اهداف توسعه پایدار و امنیت انرژی ایران کمک می‌کنند. مقایسه با مطالعات پیشین نشان داد که الگوهای سنتی ایران پتانسیل مشابهی با رویکردهای جهانی دارند، اما موانع فرهنگی و اقتصادی در ایران برجسته‌ترند. پیشنهادات شامل: هم‌راستایی مقررات ملی با اصول دایره‌ای، یارانه برای مواد بازیافتی، و آموزش معماران است. این پژوهش شکاف کیفی در تجربیات معماران ایرانی را پر کرده و به توسعه معماری پایدار کمک می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Application of circular architecture principles in optimizing fuel consumption in residential buildings in Iran

نویسندگان English

Omid Zamani 1
Amirreza Behbahani 2
1 Master of Architecture, Building Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Master of Architecture, Building Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

This study aimed to investigate the application of circular architecture principles in optimizing fossil fuel consumption in residential buildings in Iran, using a qualitative phenomenological approach. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with 15 professional architects from Tehran, Isfahan, Tabriz, and Shiraz and analyzed using thematic analysis and NVivo software. The findings identified four main themes: implementation barriers (high costs, lack of technical knowledge, cultural resistance), innovative opportunities (integration of traditional patterns such as brick and windbreak, digital innovations, interdisciplinary collaboration), practical impact (20-30% reduction in gas consumption, long-term sustainability, 15-25% reduction in CO₂ emissions), and proposed solutions (education, local research, community participation). Strauss and Corbin’s (1998) paradigmatic model showed that opportunities enhance the central phenomenon (optimizing fuel consumption), but barriers moderate it, and solutions manage this moderation. These principles contribute to Iran’s sustainable development and energy security goals by reducing dependence on fossil fuels. Comparison with previous studies showed that traditional Iranian models have similar potential to global approaches, but cultural and economic barriers are more prominent in Iran. Suggestions include: aligning national regulations with circular principles, subsidies for recycled materials, and training of architects. This research fills a qualitative gap in the experiences of Iranian architects and contributes to the development of sustainable architecture.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Circular architecture
fuel efficiency
residential buildings
sustainability
recycled materials
  1. Behbood, A. (2009). Sustainable architecture in Iran: Challenges and opportunities. Tehran University Press.
  2. Behbood, A. (2023). Circularity tools and frameworks for new buildings. Journal of Environmental and Industrial Research, 4(1), 45–62.
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  4. Cramer, J., & Di Giulio, A. (2025). Circular economy best practices in the built environment. Sustainability, 17(5), 2105.
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  6. De Wolf, C., Moncaster, A., & Campbell, A. (2024). Circular principles, building lifecycle phases and design strategies. Buildings and Cities, 5(1), 1–20.
  7. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen. (n.d.). Circular building. Retrieved October 26, 2024, from https://www.dgnb.de/en/sustainable-building/circular-building
  8. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (n.d.). Circular economy introduction. Retrieved October 26, 2024, from https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/circular-economy-introduction/overview
  9. Ghasemi, A., Mohammadi, M., & Rahimi, F. (2020). Optimization of energy consumption and daylight performance in residential building regarding windows design in hot and dry climate of Isfahan. Journal of Renewable Energy and Environment, 7(2), 54–65.
  10. Ghasemi, A., Mohammadi, M., & Rahimi, F. (2024). Optimization of energy consumption in residential housing within the framework of energy sustainability strategies: A case study in the Canary Islands. Energy and Buildings, 310, Article 114065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114065
  11. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  12. Holcim Foundation for Sustainable Construction. (n.d.). Circular design. Retrieved October 26, 2024, from https://www.holcimfoundation.org/circular-design
  13. Hosseini, S. A., Rahimi, M., & Abbasi, S. (2024). Implementing circular economy strategies in buildings: From theory to practice. In A. B. Smith (Ed.), Advances in sustainable construction (pp. 123–145). Springer.
  14. Journal of Standards. (2024). Mandatory standards of building energy consumption criteria labeling in Iran. Journal of Standards, 45(3), 12–25.
  15. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  16. Mahdavi, A., Rashid, B., & Vellei, M. (2025). Energy-driven circular design in the built environment: Rethinking architecture and infrastructure. Sustainable Cities and Society, 100, Article 105123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.105123
  17. McKinsey & Company. (2025). How circularity can make the built environment more sustainable. Retrieved October 26, 2024, from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/real-estate/our-insights/how-circularity-can-make-the-built-environment-more-sustainable
  18. Nikkhah, A., Emami, A., & Rahimi, M. (2023). A review on building energy efficient design optimization from the perspective of architects. Journal of Building Engineering, 65, Article 105678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105678
  19. Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2025). Circularity criteria and indicators at the building component and system level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 450, Article 141234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141234
  20. Rahmani, A., Hosseinzadeh, M., & Gholami, H. (2024). Vernacular Iranian housing as a sustainable model of functional and thermal performance. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(3), Article 10562. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i3.10562
  21. Rahmani, A., Hosseinzadeh, M., & Gholami, H. (2025). Application of circular economy principles in buildings: A systematic review. Building and Environment, 260, Article 111345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111345
  22. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. SAGE Publications.
  23. io. (2024, May 15). Embracing the future: Circular building for sustainable living. Retrieved October 26, 2024, from https://ugreen.io/embracing-the-future-circular-building-for-sustainable-living/
  24. University of Bedfordshire. (2025, January 10). Defining the circular economy: What is it (and how does it work)? Retrieved October 26, 2024, from https://www.ube.ac.uk/whats-happening/articles/circular-economy/
  25. World Green Building Council. (2023). A parametric approach to optimizing building construction systems and carbon footprint: A case study inspired by circularity principles. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 14(1), 1–15.
  26. World Green Building Council. (2023). Circular built environment playbook. https://worldgbc.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Circular-Built-Environment-Playbook-Report_Final.pdf
اکولوژی انسانی
دوره 4، شماره 13
زمستان 1404
صفحه 1565-1581