Evaluation of Urban Management Strategies with an Emphasis on Incentive Mechanisms to Enhance Local Participation in Waste Management: A Case Study of Tehran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Urban Management, Faculty of Urban Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 School of Urban Planning College of Fine Arts University of Tehran.
Abstract
Urban waste management has become one of the most significant challenges facing megacities, especially in developing countries, over recent decades. The aim of this study is to identify and propose efficient urban management strategies with a focus on incentive and implementation mechanisms to enhance local community participation in waste management. Tehran has been selected as the case study. Data were collected using a mixed-methods approach (qualitative and quantitative). The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with experts and stakeholders in the field of urban management, while the quantitative phase included content analysis and a comparative study of successful global experiences. Data collection tools consisted of a specialized questionnaire and a checklist for evaluating strategies based on legal, economic, social, cultural, and infrastructural criteria. The primary innovation of this research lies in presenting a localized model that combines incentive mechanisms (such as urban tax discounts, financial incentives, education, and cultural promotion) with enforcement tools (including mandatory regulations and penalties) to increase citizen participation. The findings indicate that strategies such as waste banks, deposit-return systems, green schools, and local campaigns are most compatible with Iran’s context and can play an effective role in enhancing public participation and mitigating the environmental consequences of waste disposal. Accordingly, it is recommended that urban management focus on continuous education, legislative reforms, and the design of financial incentives to facilitate the achievement of sustainable development in the field of waste management.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. شمس‌نجفی، فاطمه‌السادات و زندمقدم، محمدرضا. (۱۳۹۶). بررسی چالش‌های مدیریت پسماند شهری کلان‌شهر تهران (نمونه موردی: منطقه ۸). پنجمین کنفرانس ملی پژوهش‌های کاربردی در مهندسی عمران، معماری و مدیریت شهری. تهران. دریافت از:
  2.  https://civilica.com/doc/760522
  3. اصلانی، فرشید. (۱۴۰۲). طراحی الگوی مدیریت پسماند با رویکرد داده‌بنیاد (مطالعه موردی: شهر اصفهان). اکولوژی انسانی، 2(4)، 304319.
  4. https://doi.org/10.22034/el.2024.475104.1026
  5. اردستانی‌جوادی، حوریه، محمودی، مریم، و لشگرآرا، فرهاد. (۱۳۹۸). ارزیابی اثربخشی آموزش‌های سرای‌محله در زمینه مدیریت پسماند بر رفتار شهروندان (مطالعه موردی: منطقه ۱۴ شهرداری تهران). مطالعات علوم محیط‌زیست، 4(1)، ۱۰۶۵۱۰۷۵.
  6. شاکرفارسی، آرزو، و احمدی، هادی. (۱۳۹۸). برنامه‌ریزی و مدیریت پسماندهای شهری با رویکرد مشارکت در کاهش اثرات زیست‌محیطی آن در شهرها (مطالعه موردی: منطقه ۲۱ تهران). معماری‌شناسی: نشریه اختصاصی معماری و شهرسازی ایران، 2(13)، ۱۹.
  7. عصاران، سیداحمد، حسنی‌کاریزکی، دانیال، آزادی، عادل، و اسدی، ابوالفضل. (۱۴۰۲). بررسی مروری ارتباط مشارکت شهروندان در مدیریت پسماند در مناطق شهری. ششمین همایش ملی فناوری‌های نوین در علوم انسانی، مدیریت و بازاریابی ایران. تهران. دریافت از:
  8.  https://civilica.com/doc/1984506
  9. خوشنواز، باقر، موسوی، میر‌سعید، و اکبری‌نامدار، شبنم. (۱۴۰۲). تبیین سناریوهای محتمل و عوامل کلیدی مؤثر بر مشارکت شهروندان در مدیریت پسماند شهری (نمونه موردی: کلان‌شهر تبریز). جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، 27(85)، 6981.
  10. https://doi.org/10.22034/gp.2023.55163.3100
  11. Ahmadi, M., & Gholami, A. (2023). Urban waste management challenges in developing countries: A focus on metropolitan areas. Environmental Research Journal, 45(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/erj.2023.120135
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
  13. Everett, J. W., & Peirce, J. J. (1993). Curbside recycling in the USA: Convenience and mandatory participation. Waste Management & Research, 11(1), 49–61.
  14. Fabio, F., & Merkaj, E. (2024). Municipal strategies, fiscal incentives and co-production in urban waste management. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101817
  15. Faunce, T., & Kolodziejczyk, B. (2017). Nanowaste: Need for disposal and recycling standards. G20 Insights, 148, 202–213.
  16. Gutberlet, J. (2015). More inclusive and cleaner cities with waste management co-production: Insights from participatory epistemologies and methods. Habitat International, 46, 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.005
  17. Gutberlet, J., Carenzo, S., Kain, J. H., & Mantovani Martiniano de Azevedo, A. M. (2020). Waste picker organizations and their contributions to the circular economy: Two case studies from a global south perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 157, 104753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104753
  18. Hoornweg, D., & Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a waste: A global review of solid waste management. The World Bank.
  19. Hornsby, C., Lyons, R. C., & Nivola, P. S. (2016). From resistance to resilience: A roadmap for participatory waste governance. Journal of Environmental Management, 176, 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.019
  20. Hosseinalizadeh, R., & Izadbakhsh, H. (2021). A planning model for using municipal solid waste management technologies—considering energy, economic, and environmental impacts in Tehran, Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society.
  21. Hottle, T. A., Bilec, M. M., Brown, N. R., & Landis, A. E. (2015). Toward zero waste: Composting and recycling for sustainable venue-based events. Waste Management, 38, 86–94.
  22. Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., & Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank Publications.
  23. Kerdsuwan, S., Laohalidanond, K., & Jangsawang, W. (2015). Sustainable development and eco-friendly waste disposal technology for the local community. Energy Procedia, 79, 119–124.
  24. Lochner, C. (2022). Factors influencing purchase intention for recycled products: A comparative analysis of Germany and South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, FH Vorarlberg (Fachhochschule Vorarlberg)).
  25. Mamady, K. (2016). Factors influencing attitude, safety behavior, and knowledge regarding household waste management in Guinea: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Environmental and Public Health.
  26. Martin, M., Williams, I. D., & Clark, M. (2006). Social, cultural and structural influences on household waste recycling: A case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 48(4), 357–395.
  27. Sheikameer, B. S., Madhanraj, M., Sutharshanan, B. G. M. P., Mohandass, P. T. S. (2023). Incentive-based plastic waste segregation. https://doi.org/10.1109/smarttechcon57526.2023.10391465
  28. Tsaur, R.-C. (2014). Analysis of the Relationships among Motivation to Recycle, Satisfaction with Recovery Stations, and Willingness to Recycle in Taiwan. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 10, 137-145.
  29. Vakalis, D., Lepine, C., MacLean, H. L., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Can green schools influence academic performance? Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 51(13), 1354–1396.
  30. Weng, Y. C., Fujiwara, T., Lin, S. J., & Ma, H. W. (2012). Evaluation of the policy effect of the Pay-as-You-Throw (PAYT) systems on household solid waste reduction and the potential environmental impacts: A case study in Taiwan. Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Japan.
  31. Wilson, D. C., Velis, C., & Cheeseman, C. (2006). Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat International, 30(4), 797–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.09.005
  32. World Bank. (2022). What a waste 2.0: Global review of solid waste management. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0
  33. Zamanian, H., Alavi, N., & Gholami, M. (2020). Investigating waste management challenges in Iran: Toward a sustainable urban system. Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 18(2), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-020-00492-2