A Spatially Integrated GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Model for Flash Flood Risk Zoning in Rural Iran

Articles in Press

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Arman Niknam
Gábor Mezősi
Department of Geoinformatics physical and Environmental Geography, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
10.22034/he.2025.563960.1175
Abstract
Flash floods are one of the most destructive natural hazards, especially in rural areas where communities are highly exposed and have limited capacity to adapt. Their rapid onset, short warning times, and the intense transport of sediments pose serious risks to settlements, infrastructure, and livelihoods. In the Gorganrood watershed of Golestan Province, the combination of diverse climatic conditions, land use patterns, and various environmental, social, and economic vulnerabilities further exacerbates these risks. The goal of this research is to create a detailed model for assessing the risk of flash floods and their impacts on rural communities. This study examines the factors that contribute to flash floods and the vulnerability of rural populations. Additionally, it aims to provide a comprehensive scientific basis for understanding flash flood dynamics and their impacts, which can support community preparedness and effective risk reduction measures. The study employs a mixed-methods approach that combines spatial analysis with field-based data collection. A structured questionnaire was distributed to 75 participants, including residents, experts, and local officials, to assess the significance of various indicators: physical, institutional, socio-cultural, economic, and environmental. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS, and GIS was utilized to examine spatial patterns and identify hotspots of vulnerability. The findings show that land-use dynamics are the most influential factor in determining flash flood risk, receiving the highest mean score (3.41), while environmental indicators ranked lowest (2.94). Risk assessments further revealed that villages in central and northern sub-basins face the greatest exposure, though vulnerability patterns remain fragmented and lack spatial coherence. Importantly, socio-cultural and institutional factors—including income, education, preparedness, governance, and coordination—were consistently prioritized by both experts and community members as decisive drivers of resilience. The principal outcome of the study is an integrated spatial model that combines hazard parameters with socio-economic and institutional vulnerabilities. Structured across five analytical stages, the model provides a comprehensive framework for identifying high-risk areas and explaining variations in community resilience. By demonstrating the interplay between physical drivers and social dynamics, the research advances the understanding of flash flood risks in rural settings and delivers practical insights that can guide more effective preparedness and risk reduction measures.

Keywords

Subjects

  1. Abdi, K., Kamyabi, S. and Zand Moghaddam, M.R., 2019. Integrated assessment of vulnerability, resiliency and spatial risk against flooding in Sari city. Physical Geography Research, 51(3), pp.431–445. 10.22059/jphgr.2019.272801.1007324
  2. Abdollahzadeh, G. and Sharifzadeh, M.S., 2023. Identifying the determinants of public participation in flood risk management: A case study of flood-prone rural areas in Golestan Province, Iran. Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge (quarterly), 13(3), pp.318-335. 10.32598/DMKP.13.3.762.1
  3. Abebe, Y.A., Kabir, G. and Tesfamariam, S., 2019. Assessing urban areas vulnerability to pluvial flooding using GIS applications and multi-criteria decision analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, pp.118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.066
  4. Acquaintance with crisis management, 2007. Acquaintance with crisis management (in Persian). Available at: http://kmu.ac.ir/Images/UserFiles/891/file/%D9%85%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AA%20%D8%A8%D8%AD%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%20%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C.pdf (accessed 10 September 2020).
  5. Ahmadi, A. and Manoochehri, S., 2020. Assessing the status and analysis of factors affecting the desirability of crisis management of environmental hazards in Ghaenat City. Spatial Planning, 10(2), pp.23–56. 10.22108/sppl.2020.117853.1398
  6. Ahmadi, S., Ghanbari Movahed, R., Gholamrezaie, S. and Rahimian, M., 2022. Assessing the vulnerability of rural households to floods at pol-e Dokhtar region in Iran. Sustainability, 14(2), p.762. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020762
  7. Alam, G.M., Alam, K. and Mushtaq, S., 2016. Influence of institutional access and social capital on adaptation decision: Empirical evidence from hazard-prone rural households in Bangladesh. Ecological Economics, 130, pp.243–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.012
  8. Alamri, N., Afolabi, K., Ewea, H. and Elfeki, A., 2023. Evaluation of the time of concentration models for enhanced peak flood estimation in arid regions. Sustainability, 15(3), 1987. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031987
  9. Aldrich, D.P., 2012. Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-disaster Recovery. University of Chicago Press.
  10. APFM (Associated Programme on Flood Management), 2007. Guidance on Flash Flood Management: Recent Experiences from Central and Eastern Europe. Flood Management Tools Series, WMO/GWP, Geneva.
  11. Askar, S., Zeraat Peyma, S., Yousef, M.M., Prodanova, N.A., Muda, I. and Elsahabi, M., 2022. Flood susceptibility mapping using remote sensing and integration of decision table classifier and metaheuristic algorithms. Applied Water Science. (online first). https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193062
  12. Bai, L., Shi, C., Li, L., Yang, Y. and Wu, J., 2018. Accuracy of CHIRPS satellite-rainfall products over mainland China. Remote Sensing, 10(3), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10030362
  13. Badri, S.A., Rezvani, M. and Khodadadi, P., 2019. Designing a pattern for challenges of spatial policy-making formulation in Iran’s rural regions. Majlis and Rahbord, 26(99), pp.5–34. https://sid.ir/paper/397237/en
  14. Baran-Zgłobicka, B., Godziszewska, D. and Zgłobicki, W., 2021. The flash floods risk in the local spatial planning (case study: Lublin Upland, E Poland). Resources, 10(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10020014
  15. Bathrellos, G.D., Karymbalis, E., Skilodimou, H.D., Gaki-Papanastassiou, K. and Baltas, E.A., 2016. Urban flood hazard assessment in the basin of Athens Metropolitan City, Greece. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75, 319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5157-1
  16. Bauer, M., Dostal, T., Krasa, J., Jachymova, B., David, V., Devaty, J. et al., 2019. Risk to residents, infrastructure, and water bodies from flash floods and sediment transport. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191, 228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7216-7
  17. Beven, K.J. and Kirkby, M.J., 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 24(1), pp.43–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667909491834
  18. Berkes, F., 2007. Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: Lessons from resilience thinking. Natural Hazards, 41, pp.283–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7
  19. Bilașco, Ș., Hognogi, G.G., Roșca, S., Pop, A.M., Iuliu, V., Fodorean, I., Marian-Potra, A.C. and Sestras, P., 2022. Flash flood risk assessment and mitigation in digital-era governance using unmanned aerial vehicle and GIS spatial analyses: Case study—small river basins. Remote Sensing, 14(10), 2481. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102481
  20. Birkmann, J., 2006. Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions. In: Birkmann, J. (ed.), Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: Towards Disaster Resilient Societies. United Nations University Press, pp.9–54.
  21. Boggia, A., Massei, G., Pace, E., Rocchi, L., Paolotti, L. and Attard, M., 2018. Spatial multicriteria analysis for sustainability assessment: A new model for decision making. Land Use Policy, 71, pp.281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.036
  22. Bormann, H., Kebschull, J. and Ahlhorn, F., 2020. Challenges of flood risk management at the German coast. In: Water Resources Quality and Management in Baltic Sea Countries, pp.141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39701-2_8
  23. Brandolini, P., Faccini, F., Robbiano, A. and Terranova, R., 2008. Relationship between flood hazards and geomorphology applied to land planning in the upper Aveto Valley (Liguria, Italy). Geografia Fisica e Dinamica Quaternaria, 31, pp.73–82. https://www.gfdq.glaciologia.it/index.php/GFDQ/article/view/319
  24. Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), pp.5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
  25. Bronstert, A., 2003. Floods and climate change: Interactions and impacts. Risk Analysis, 23(3), pp.545–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00335
  26. Bui, D.T., Hoang, T.-H., Paull, D., Khosravi, K., Chapi, K., Prakash, I., Revhaug, I. and Pham, B.T., 2019. Flood spatial modeling in northern Iran using remote sensing and GIS. Remote Sensing, 11(13), 1589.
    https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11131589
  27.  
  28. Cahyono, C. and Adidarma, W.K., 2019. Influence analysis of peak rate factor in the flood events’ calibration process using HEC–HMS. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 5, pp.1705–1722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00625-8
  29. Chai, T. and Draxler, R.R., 2014. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geoscientific Model Development, 7(3), pp.1247–1250. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014
  30. Chapi, K., Singh, V.P., Shirzadi, A., Shahabi, H., Bui, D.T., Pham, B.T. and Khosravi, K., 2017. A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 95, pp.229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.012
  31. Chen, W., Hong, H., Li, S., Shahabi, H., Wang, Y., Wang, X. and Ahmad, B.B., 2019. Flood susceptibility modelling using novel hybrid approach of reduced-error pruning trees with bagging and random subspace ensembles. Journal of Hydrology, 575, pp.864–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.089
  32. Costache, R., 2014. Using GIS techniques for assessing lag time and concentration time in small river basins: Case study—Pecineaga river basin, Romania. Geographia Technica, 9(1), pp.31–38.
  33. Costache, R., Tin, T.T., Arabameri, A., Crăciun, A., Ajin, R.S., Costache, I. et al., 2022. Flash-flood hazard using deep learning based on H2O R package and fuzzy-multicriteria decision-making analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 609, 127747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127747
  34. Cutter, S.L., Boruff, B.J., and Shirley, W.L., 2003. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
  35. Cutter, S.L., Burton, C.G. and Emrich, C.T., 2010. Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1732
  36. Cutter, S.L., Ash, K.D. and Emrich, C.T., 2015. The geographies of community disaster resilience. Global Environmental Change, 29, pp.65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
  37. de Bruijn, K., Klijn, F., McGahey, C., Mens, M. and van der Most, H., 2008. Long-term strategies for flood risk management: Scenario definition and strategic alternative design. FLOODsite report T14-08-01.
  38. De Reu, J., Bourgeois, J., Bats, M., Zwertvaegher, A., Gelorini, V., De Smedt, P. et al., 2013. Application of the topographic position index to heterogeneous landscapes. Geomorphology, 186, pp.39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.015
  39. De Risi, R., Jalayer, F., De Paola, F., Carozza, S., Yonas, N., Giugni, M. and Gasparini, P., 2020. From flood risk mapping toward reducing vulnerability: The case of Addis Ababa. Natural Hazards, 100, pp.387–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03817-8
  40. Demir, V. and Kisi, O., 2016. Flood hazard mapping by using geographic information system and hydraulic model: Mert River, Samsun, Turkey. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 9(3), 168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2130-1
  41. DFID, 2006. Reducing the Risk of Disasters: Helping to Achieve Sustainable Poverty Reduction in a Vulnerable World. Department for International Development, London.
  42. Douglas, I., 2017. Flooding in African cities: Scales of causes, teleconnections, risks, vulnerability and impacts. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 64(5), pp.597–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.024
  43. Dumenu, W.K. and Obeng, E.A., 2016. Climate change and rural communities in Ghana: Social vulnerability, impacts, adaptations and policy implications. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, pp.208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.010
  44. Eftekhari, A.R., Pourtaheri, M., Sadeghlou, T. and Qidari, H.S., 2010. Analyzing the effective factors in participatory flood management in rural areas (case study: flooded villages of Gorganrud basin in Golestan Province). Rural Research, 1(2), pp.1–26. http://journals.ut.ac.ir/page/article-popup.html?articleId=353216
  45. Enku, T., 2009. Estimation of Evapotranspiration from Satellite Remote Sensing and Meteorological Data over the Fogera Flood Plain, Ethiopia. MSc thesis, University of Twente.
  46. Erdlenbruch, K., Thoyer, S., Grelot, F., Kast, R. and Enjolras, G., 2009. Risk-sharing in the context of the French Flood Prevention Action Programmes. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, pp.363–369.                                    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.002
  47. European Parliament, 2001. GIS for sustainability assessment. Directorate General for Research, Directorate A STOA—Scientific and Technological Options Assessment, Briefing Note No. 06/2017. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu (accessed 10 September 2020).
  48. Fernández, D.S. and Lutz, M.A., 2010. Urban flood hazard zoning in Tucumán Province, Argentina, using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Engineering Geology, 111(1–4), pp.90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.006
  49. Few, R., 2003. Flooding, vulnerability and coping strategies: Local responses to a global threat. Progress in Development Studies, 3(1), 43–58.
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993403ps049ra
  50. Fisher, A., Rudin, C. and Dominici, F., 2019. All models are wrong, but many are useful: Learning a variable’s importance by studying an entire class of prediction models simultaneously. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 20(177), pp.1–81. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.01489.
  51. Foudi, S., Osés-Eraso, N. and Tamayo, I., 2015. Integrated spatial flood risk assessment: The case of Zaragoza. Land Use Policy, 42, pp.278–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.002
  52. Gaillard, J.C. and Mercer, J., 2013. From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 93–114.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512446717
  53. Gersonius, B., Van Buuren, A., Zethof, M. and Kelder, E., 2016. Resilient flood risk strategies: Institutional preconditions for implementation. Ecology and Society, 21(4), 28. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-08752-210428.
  54. Gersonius, B., Zevenbergen, C. and van Herk, S., 2008. Managing flood risk in the urban environment: Linking spatial planning, risk assessment, communication and policy. In: Adaptive and Integrated Water Management: Coping with Complexity and Uncertainty, pp.263–275.
  55. Ghosh, A. and Kar, S.K., 2018. Application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for flood risk assessment: A case study in Malda district of West Bengal, India. Natural Hazards, 94, pp.349–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3392-y
  56. Ghosh, M., Ghosh, S. and Karmakar, S., 2024. Assessment of flood risk in a coastal city considering multiple socio-economic vulnerability scenarios. Proceedings of IAHS, 386, pp.299–306. https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-386-299-2024
  57. Golestan Province Research Studies, 2015. Climatic Characteristics and Watershed Classification of Golestan Province. Golestan Province Research Center, Gorgan.
  58. Guo, E., Zhang, J., Ren, X., Zhang, Q. and Sun, Z., 2014. Integrated risk assessment of flood disaster based on improved set pair analysis and the variable fuzzy set theory in central Liaoning Province, China. Natural Hazards, 74, pp.947–965.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1238-9, 2014.
  59. Hajibigloo, M. and Sheikh, V., 2018. Flood risk management analysis based on concepts of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability by providing frameworks and models. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 5(1), pp.73–82. https://doi.org/10.22067/jwsd.v5i1.62313
  60. Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J. and Rozenberg, J., 2020. Adaptation Principles: A Guide for Designing Strategies for Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://www.adaptation-undp.org/resources/reports/adaptation-principles-guid
  61. Hartmann, T. and Driessen, P.P.J., 2017. The flood risk management plan: Towards spatial water governance. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 10(2), pp.145–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12077
  62. Hasanuzzaman, M., Islam, A., Bera, B. and Shit, P.K., 2022. A comparison of performance measures of three machine learning algorithms for flood susceptibility mapping of river Silabati (tropical river, India). Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 127, 103198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2022.103198
  63. Hosseini Sabzevari, S.A., Mehdipour, H. and Aslani, F., 2023. An assessment of flash flood susceptibility in Golestan Province, Iran, using multiple computational approaches. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-02-2023-0018
  64. Huq, N., Hugé, J., Boon, E. and Gain, A.K., 2015. Climate change impacts in agricultural communities in rural areas of coastal Bangladesh: A review of vulnerabilities and adaptation.
    Environmental Science & Policy, 48, pp. 7–15.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.030
  65. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
  66. Iran National Disaster Management Law (2013): Structure, Roles, and Responsibilities. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Tehran.
  67. Islam, M.M., Ceccato, P. and Shepherd, J.M., 2023. A systematic review of the socioeconomic impacts of flood-related disasters under climate change.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 92, 103718.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103718
  68. ISWANDI, U., Widiatmaker, W., Pramudya, B. and Barus, B., 2016. Delineation of flood hazard zones by using a multi-criteria evaluation approach in Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 6(3), pp.205–214. http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/1
  69. Karimi Firozjaei, M. and Neysani Samany, N., 2018. Flood risk assessment using multi-criteria decision making based on Dempster–Shafer intuitive reasoning (case study: Nekarood Basin). Physical Geography Research, 50(1), pp.177–194. 10.22059/jphgr.2018.229904.1007026
  70. Kazakis, N., Kougias, I. and Patsialis, T., 2015. Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and Analytical Hierarchy Process: Application in Rhodope–Evros region, Greece. Science of the Total Environment, 538, pp.555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.055
  71. Katsanos, D., Retalis, A. and Michaelides, S., 2016. Validation of a high-resolution precipitation database (CHIRPS) over Cyprus for a 30-year period. Atmospheric Research, 169, pp.459–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.05.015
  72. Khosravi, K., Pham, B.T., Chapi, K., Shirzadi, A., Shahabi, H., Revhaug, I., Prakash, I. and Tien Bui, D., 2018. A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz Watershed, Northern Iran. Science of the Total Environment, 627, pp.744–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.266
  73. Klijn, F., Kreibich, H., De Moel, H. and Penning-Rowsell, E., 2015. Adaptive flood risk management planning based on a comprehensive flood risk conceptualisation. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20, pp.845–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9638-z
  74. Koks, E.E., Jongman, B., Husby, T.G. and Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. Combining hazard, exposure and social vulnerability to provide lessons for flood risk management. Environmental Science & Policy, 47, pp.42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.013
  75. Korah, P.I. and Lopez, F.M.J., 2015. Mapping flood vulnerable areas in Quetzaltenango, Guatemala, using GIS. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 5, pp.132–143. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEES/article/view/21000
  76. Krawchenko, T. and Tomaney, J., 2023. The governance of land use: A conceptual framework. Land, 12(3), 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030608
  77. Křížek, M. and Engel, Z., 2003. Geomorphological consequences of the 2002 flood in the Otava river drainage basin. Moravian Geographical Reports, 11(2), pp.38–47. (details often cited like this; kept generic) http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/160859
  78. Laing, M. and Wallis, P.J., 2016. Scientists versus policy-makers: Building capacity for productive interactions across boundaries in the urban water sector. Environmental Science & Policy, 66, pp.23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.08.001
  79. Lappas, I. and Kallioras, A., 2019. Flood susceptibility assessment through GIS-based multi-criteria approach and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in a river basin in Central Greece. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(3), pp.1–8.
  80. Li, K., Wu, S., Dai, E. and Xu, Z., 2012. Flood loss analysis and quantitative risk assessment in China. Natural Hazards, 63, pp.737–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0180-y
  81. Marchi, L., Cavalli, M., Amponsah, W., Borga, M. and Crema, S., 2016. Upper limits of flash flood stream power in Europe. Geomorphology, 272, pp.68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.11.005
  82. Merchán-Sanmartín, B., Aucapeña-Parrales, J., Alcívar-Redrován, R., Carrión-Mero, P., Jaya-Montalvo, M. and Arias-Hidalgo, M., 2022. Earth dam design for drinking water management and flood control: A case study. Water, 14(13), 2029. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14132029
  83. MirzaAli, M., Nazari, A.H. and Ownegh, M., 2018. Measuring the physical dimension of rural resilience against flood (case study: Gorganroud watershed basin). Physical Social Planning, 5(3), pp.111–133. https://doi.org/10.30473/psp.2018.5262
  84. Mohammadnejad, M., Mokhtari, L. and Behniyafar, A., 2020. Flood risk zoning in the Kalat river basin (sub-basin extreme to Kalat city). Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 8(3), pp.203–221.
  85. Mohanty, M.P., Vittal, H., Yadav, V., Ghosh, S., Rao, G.S. and Karmakar, S., 2020. A new bivariate risk classifier for flood management considering hazard and socio-economic dimensions. Journal of Environmental Management, 255, 109733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109733
  86. Mollazehi, A., Pudineh, M., Khosravi, M., Armesh, M. and Dehvari, A., 2020. Assessment of the potential flood risk in Sarbaz drainage basin. Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences, 20(58), pp.241–260. https://sid.ir/paper/382318/en
  87. Mora, C., Spirandelli, D., Franklin, E.C., Lynham, J., Kantar, M.B., Miles, W. et al., 2018. Broad threat to humanity from cumulative climate hazards intensified by greenhouse gas emissions. Nature Climate Change, 8, pp.1062–1071. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0315-6
  88. Moradi, H. and Delavar, M.R., 2016. Assessment of social vulnerability to flood hazards using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis: A case study of rural areas in Golestan Province, Iran. Natural Hazards, 82(1), pp.405–426.
  89. Nakagawa, Y. and Shaw, R., 2004. Social capital: A missing link to disaster recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 22(1), pp.5–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/02807270040220010
  90. Ndamani, F. and Watanabe, T., 2015. Farmers’ perceptions about adaptation practices to climate change and barriers to adaptation: A micro-level study in Ghana. Water, 7, pp.4593–4604. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7094593
  91. Nguyen, B.D., Minh, D.T., Ahmad, A. and Nguyen, Q.L., 2020. The role of relative slope length in flood hazard mapping using AHP and GIS (case study: Lam River Basin, Vietnam). Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 13(2), pp.115–123. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2020-48
  92. Nhamo, N., 2014. Adaptation strategies to climate extremes among smallholder farmers: A case of cropping practices in the Volta Region of Ghana. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 4(1), pp.198–213. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjast/2014/5725.
  93. Nordbeck, R., Steurer, R. and Löschner, L., 2019. The future orientation of Austria’s flood policies: From flood control to anticipatory flood risk management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(11), pp.1864–1885. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1515731
  94. Organizational Portal of the Iranian Statistics, 2016. Iranian National Census 2015. Statistical Centre of Iran, Tehran.
  95. Orimoloye, I.R., Belle, J.A. and Ololade, O.O., 2021. Drought disaster monitoring using MODIS-derived index for drought years: A space-based information for ecosystems and environmental conservation. Journal of Environmental Management, 284, 112028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112028
  96. Ouma, Y.O. and Tateishi, R., 2014. Urban flood vulnerability and risk mapping using integrated multi-parametric AHP and GIS: Methodological overview and case study assessment. Water, 6(6), pp.1515–1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6061515
  97. Öztürk, M., Copty, N.K. and Saysel, A.K., 2013. Modeling the impact of land use change on the hydrology of a rural watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 497, pp.97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.022
  98. Parvaresh, E., Mahdavi, R., Malekian, A., Esmaelpour, Y. and Holisaz, A., 2019. Studying the main factors and prioritizing the flooding potential of sub-watersheds using fuzzy TOPSIS and ELECTRE III (case study: Sarkhoon Watershed). Watershed Engineering and Management, 11(2), pp.493–507. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijwmse.2018.115868.1369
  99. Paton, D., 2007. Preparing for natural hazards: The role of community trust. Disaster Prevention and Management, 16(3), pp.370–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560710758323
  100. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O. et al., 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, pp.2825–2830.
  101. POURTAHERI, M., 2016. Spatial-physical zoning of sustainable rural housing: Case study—villages of Lorestan Province. The Journal of Spatial Planning, 20(4), pp.139–174.
  102. Pourghasemi, H.R., Razavi-Termeh, S.V., Kariminejad, N., Hong, H. & Chen, W., 2020. An assessment of metaheuristic approaches for flood assessment. Journal of Hydrology, 582, 124536.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124536
  103. Rahmati, O., Yousefi, S., Kalantari, Z., Uuemaa, E., Teimurian, T., Keesstra, S. et al., 2019. Multi-hazard exposure mapping using machine learning techniques: A case study from Iran. Remote Sensing, 11(16), 1943. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11161943
  104. Ran, J. and Nedovic-Budic, Z., 2016. Integrating spatial planning and flood risk management: A new conceptual framework for the spatially integrated policy infrastructure. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 57, pp.68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.01.008
  105. Reed, M.S., Vella, S., Challies, E., de Vente, J., Frewer, L., Hohenwallner-Ries, D. et al., 2018. A theory of participation: What makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restoration Ecology, 26(S1), pp.S7–S17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541
  106. Rezvani, M.R., Maasum, M.G., Kouchaki, M., Saei, A. and Biarjomandi, E.T., 2015. Spatial analysis of rural social insurance in Iran and its impact on rural development (case study: Doostan rural district, Badreh town). Rural Development Strategies, pp.Pe1–Pe20. http://uijs.ui.ac.ir/urs/files/site1/user_files_5e4b65/eng/m1365k76-A-10-882-1-1ead7bc.pdf
  107. Rohman, A., Comber, A. and Mitchell, G., 2019. Evaluation of natural flood management using curve number in the Ciliwung Basin, West Java. Methodology, 78, pp.23–28.
  108. Roostaie, S., Mosavi, R. and Alizadehgorgi, G., 2017. Watershed flood zoning map preparation using CN and GIS/RS methods: A case study on Nekarood. Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 6(1), pp.108–118. https://www.geomorphologyjournal.ir/article_78078_en.html
  109. Saidi, A. (2013). Structural-functional dynamism: An alternative approach in spatial planning. Journal of Space Economy and Rural Development, 1, 1–18. http://serd.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1558-en.html
  110. Samuels, P.G., Klijn, F. and Dijkman, J., 2006. An analysis of the current practice of policies on river flood risk management in different countries. Irrigation and Drainage, 55, S141–S156. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.257
  111. Sayers, P., Yuanyuan, L., Galloway, G., Penning-Rowsell, E., Shen, F., Wen, K. et al., 2013. Flood Risk Management: A Strategic Approach. UNESCO, Paris. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/81
  112. Sejati, A.W., Putri, S.N.A.K., Rahayu, S., Buchori, I., Rahayu, K., Wiratmaja, I.G.A.A., Muzaki, A.J. and Basuki, Y., 2023. Flood hazard risk assessment based on multi-criteria spatial analysis GIS as input for spatial planning policies in Tegal Regency, Indonesia. Geographica Pannonica, 27(1), pp.1–15.
  113. Seejata, K., Yodying, A., Wongthadam, T., Mahavik, N. and Tantanee, S., 2018. Assessment of flood hazard areas using Analytical Hierarchy Process over the Lower Yom Basin, Sukhothai Province. Procedia Engineering, 212, pp.340–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.044
  114. Sejati, A.W., Putri, S.N.A.K., Rahayu, S., Buchori, I., Rahayu, K., Wiratmaja, I.G.A.A., Muzaki, A.J. and Basuki, Y., 2023. Flood hazard risk assessment based on multi-criteria spatial analysis GIS as input for spatial planning policies in Tegal Regency, Indonesia.
    Geographica Pannonica, 27(1), pp. 36–48.
    https://doi.org/10.5937/gp27-41015
  115. Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H., Valavi, R., Shahabi, H., Chapi, K. and Shirzadi, A., 2018. Novel forecasting approaches using combination of machine learning and statistical models for flood susceptibility mapping. Journal of Environmental Management, 217, pp.1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.089
  116. Shah, I., Elahi, N., Alam, A., Dawar, S. and Dogar, A.A., 2020. Institutional arrangement for disaster risk management: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 101784.
  117. Singh, M. and Sinha, R., 2020. Distribution, diversity, and geomorphic evolution of floodplain wetlands and wetland complexes in the Ganga plains of north Bihar, India. Geomorphology, 351, 106960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106960
  118. Sinha, D.D., Singh, A.N. and Singh, U.S., 2019. Flood risk zoning in rice croplands using remote sensing and GIS. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) – India Office report.
  119. Smith, A., Bates, P.D., Wing, O., Sampson, C., Quinn, N. and Neal, J., 2019. New estimates of flood exposure in developing countries using high-resolution population data. Nature Communications, 10, 1814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09282-y
  120. Špitalar, M., Gourley, J.J., Lutoff, C., Kirstetter, P.E., Brilly, M., and Carr, N., 2014. Analysis of flash flood parameters and human impacts in the US from 2006 to 2012. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 863–870.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.004
  121. Stefanidis, S. and Stathis, D., 2013. Assessment of flood hazard based on natural and anthropogenic factors using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Natural Hazards, 68, pp.569–585.                                                                                         https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0639-5
  122. Statistical Center of Iran. 2020. Available online: https://www.amar.org.ir (accessed on 10 September 2020).
  123. Suwanno, P., Yaibok, C., Pornbunyanon, T., Kanjanakul, C., Buathongkhue, C., Tsumita, N. and Fukuda, A., 2023. GIS-based identification and analysis of suitable evacuation areas and routes in flood-prone zones of Nakhon Si Thammarat municipality. IATSS Research, 47(3), pp.416–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2023.08.004
  124. Taherizadeh, M., Niknam, A., Nguyen-Huy, T., Mezősi, G. and Sarli, R., 2023. Flash flood-risk areas zoning using integration of decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory, GIS-based analytic network process and satellite-derived information. Natural Hazards, 118(3), pp.2309–2335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06089-5
  125. Tehrany, M.S., Pradhan, B. and Jebur, M.N., 2013. Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule-based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 504, pp.69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.034
  126. Tehrany, M.S., Jones, S. and Shabani, F., 2019. Identifying the essential flood conditioning factors for flood prone area mapping using machine learning techniques. Catena, 175, pp.174–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.011
  127. Teluguntla, P., Ryu, D., George, B. and Walker, J.P., 2020. Impact of flooded rice paddy on remotely sensed evapotranspiration in the Krishna River Basin, India. Hydrological Processes, 34(10), pp.2190–2199. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13748
  128. Tien Bui, D., Shirzadi, A., Shahabi, H., Chapi, K., Omidavr, E., Pham, B.T. et al., 2019. A novel ensemble artificial intelligence approach for gully erosion mapping in a semi-arid watershed (Iran). Sensors, 19, 2444. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19112444
  129. UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction) 2019. Global Assessment report 2019. https://gar.unisdr.org/report-2019. Accessed 5 Mar 2020.
  130. UNISDR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction), 2015. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. United Nations, Geneva.
  131. Van den Berg, M., Fort, R., & Burger, K. (2009). Natural hazards and risk aversion: Experimental evidence from Latin America. Paper presented at the International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Beijing, China. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.51394
  132. Wang, G., Liu, Y., Hu, Z., Lyu, Y., Zhang, G., Liu, J. et al., 2020. Flood risk assessment based on fuzzy synthetic evaluation method in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei metropolitan area, China. Sustainability, 12(4), 1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041451
  133. Wang, H., Yun, R., Zhang, J. and Zhao, R., 2022. Sensitivity analysis of the flash flood hazard by coupling variable fuzzy method and mutual entropy. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 15(2), e12792. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12792
  134. Watt, W.E. and Chow, K.A., 1985. A general expression for basin lag time. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(2), pp.294–300. https://doi.org/10.1139/l85-031
  135. Willmott, C.J. and Matsuura, K., 2005. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research, 30(1), pp.79–82. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr030079
  136. Willmott, C.J., Robeson, S.M. and Matsuura, K., 2005. Climatology of terrestrial seasonal water cycle variability. International Journal of Climatology, 25(15), pp.1965–1981.
  137. Williams, R.H., 1996. European Union Spatial Policy and Planning. Paul Chapman, London.
  138. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T. and Davis, I., 2004. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. 2nd ed. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714775.
  139. WMO, 2009. Integrated Flood Management: Concept Paper. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva. https://www.floodmanagement.info/publications/concept_paper_e.pdf
  140. Yari, A., Ostadtaghizadeh, A., Ardalan, A., Zarezadeh, Y., Boubakran, M.S., Bidarpoor, F. and Rahimiforoushani, A., 2019. Underlying factors affecting death due to flood in Iran: A qualitative content analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 40, 101258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101258
  141. Yusra, A.H., 2019. Landforms classification of Wadi Al-Mujib Basin in Jordan, based on topographic position index (TPI), and production of a flood forecasting map. Dirasat, Human and Social Sciences, 46(3).
  142. Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. and Zakarevicius, A., 2012.
    Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment method (WASPAS).
    Informatica, 23(4), pp. 597–618.     https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2012.356
  143. Ziaiian Firouz Abadi, P., Badragh Nejad, A., Sarli, R., & Babaie, M. (2020). Measurement and identification of areas susceptible to flood spreading from the viewpoint of geological formations in Birjand watershed using RS/GIS. Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences, 20(57), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.29252/jgs.20.57.1
Human Ecology

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 03 December 2025