Despite the central role of public spaces in shaping the social life of cities, many of these spaces have become mere transitional areas due to the lack of perceptual stimuli and meaningful experiences. Meanwhile, art based environmental graphics, by employing the visual, semiotic, and aesthetic capacities of urban art, can act as an effective factor in activating spatial experience and enhancing social interaction in urban environments. Therefore, this study aims to investigate how art based environmental graphics influence social interaction in public spaces. The present research adopts a qualitative approach based on a case study strategy. Data were collected through three complementary methods: social semiotic analysis of selected examples, systematic observation of public spaces, and semi structured interviews with users. Data analysis was conducted using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings indicate that art based environmental graphics – by attracting attention, creating cognitive pause, arousing curiosity and meaning seeking, and fostering emotional and mental engagement – can facilitate dialogue, shared experience, and increased social interactions in public spaces. The results also show that the effectiveness of these interventions depends on the aesthetic quality of the work, its semiotic capacity, and the congruence between the artistic intervention and the spatial context. Accordingly, environmental graphics should be regarded not merely as a tool for beautification, but as a mechanism for enhancing the quality of urban experience, strengthening sense of place, and revitalising social life in public spaces.
Altman, I., & Low, S. M. (Eds.). (1992). Place attachment. Plenum Press.
Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford University Press.
Bihaviyan and Nojaviyan Gohar Danesh Company. (2013). Social and cultural impact assessment of mural painting and environmental graphic projects in District 7 of Tehran [Research project]. Tehran Municipality. (in Persian).
Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Les presses du réel.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2010). Public places, urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design (2nd ed.). Architectural Press.
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space (J. Koch, Trans.). Island Press.
Ghiyasvand, A. (2018). Investigating the attitudes of Tehran citizens towards mural paintings: An empirical study of District 19. Quarterly Journal of Urban and Regional Development Planning, *3*(4), 67–98. (in Persian).
Golden, J., Rice, R., & Kinney, M. Y. (2002). Philadelphia murals and the stories they tell. Temple University Press.
Jahani Dowlatabad, E. (2012). Social and cultural impact assessment of mural painting and environmental graphic projects in District 11 of Tehran [Research project]. Tehran Municipality. (in Persian).
Khansari, M. (2009). A look at the visual identity of the city and the place of urban graphics. Newsletter of the Iranian Graphic Designers Society, *12*(35), 34–36. (in Persian).
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as an ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, *4*(3), 455–485. doi:10.1177/146613810343007
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell.
Mohammadi, M. (2015). Studying and examining the aesthetic dimensions of wall paintings in Tehran [Research project]. Tehran Urban Planning and Studies Center. (in Persian).
Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. Paragon House.
Sadeghpour, L. (2010). Urban furniture is incompatible. Architecture and Urbanism Information Base. (in Persian).
Sajjadzadeh, H., Karimi Moshaver, M., & Vahdat, S. (2017). Visual reading of environmental graphics in urban spaces, with an emphasis on mural painting: a case study of Tehran. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, *10*(18), 45–58. (in Persian).
Shojaee, D., & Partovi, P. (2015). Factors affecting the creation and enhancement of sociability in public spaces with different scales in Tehran: Case study of public spaces of two neighborhoods and one district in District 7 of Tehran. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 12(34), 93–108. (in Persian).
Stern, M. J., & Seifert, S. C. (2003). An assessment of the community impact of the Philadelphia Department of Recreation Mural Arts Program. University of Pennsylvania, School of Social Work.
Dadejani,J , Amani,H , Mohammadi,A and Mirzaei Kootenaei,M . (2026). The Impact of Art Based Environmental Graphics on Social Interaction in Public Spaces. (e245000). Human Ecology, (), e245000 doi: 10.22034/he.2026.581396.1207
MLA
Dadejani,J , , Amani,H , , Mohammadi,A , and Mirzaei Kootenaei,M . "The Impact of Art Based Environmental Graphics on Social Interaction in Public Spaces" .e245000 , Human Ecology, , , 2026, e245000. doi: 10.22034/he.2026.581396.1207
HARVARD
Dadejani J, Amani H, Mohammadi A, Mirzaei Kootenaei M. (2026). 'The Impact of Art Based Environmental Graphics on Social Interaction in Public Spaces', Human Ecology, (), e245000. doi: 10.22034/he.2026.581396.1207
CHICAGO
J Dadejani, H Amani, A Mohammadi and M Mirzaei Kootenaei, "The Impact of Art Based Environmental Graphics on Social Interaction in Public Spaces," Human Ecology, (2026): e245000, doi: 10.22034/he.2026.581396.1207
VANCOUVER
Dadejani J, Amani H, Mohammadi A, Mirzaei Kootenaei M. The Impact of Art Based Environmental Graphics on Social Interaction in Public Spaces. EL. 2026;():e245000 (In Persian). doi: 10.22034/he.2026.581396.1207