Evaluation of the Effects of Microsilica and Rice Husk Ash on the Mechanical Bond Properties of Repair Layers Made of High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete with Normal Concrete Using Artificial Neural Networks

Document Type : Article extracted From phd dissertation

Authors
1 Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying, Qa.C., Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
2 Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying, Qa.C., Islamic Azad University Qazvin, Iran.
Abstract
In this study, high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete was used as the repair layer. To develop the model, 17 mix designs in three distinct categories were employed. High-performance concrete mixtures were prepared with three dosage levels of microsilica (SF) and rice husk ash (RHA), at 5%, 10%, and 15% by weight of cement. Fiber-reinforced concrete mixtures were produced using two types of fibers: steel fibers (StF) and polypropylene fibers (PPF). For specimen preparation, the substrate concrete was first cast in specific molds for the pull-off test; after 28 days, the specimen surfaces were overlaid with other mix designs under two surface preparation conditions, namely grooved and wire-brushed surfaces. After setting and demolding, curing was carried out under two conditions: water ponding and open-air exposure. The maximum pull-off strength was obtained in specimens containing microsilica, and grooved surface preparation showed a positive effect on achieving higher pull-off strength. Artificial neural networks were employed using the results of the pull-off and slant shear tests to predict the mechanical behavior of the repair layer. A total of 408 data points were used as inputs for the neural network, including 286 samples for training and 61 samples for final testing. The network inputs were classified into five categories, including specimen ages of 28 and 120 days, two surface preparation methods (grooved and wire-brushed), and the type of mix design, while the output consisted of the test result. For this purpose, two types of neural networks, namely multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basis function (RBF), were used. Prediction and validation using the artificial neural networks confirmed that ANN performance in predicting the experimental results is reliable and cost-effective in terms of both time and expense.
Keywords
Subjects

1.      Abrishambaf, A., Cunha, V. M. C. F., & Barros, J. A. O. (2014). The influence of fibre orientation on the post-cracking tensile behaviour of steel fibre reinforced self-compacting concrete. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 9(31), 38-53. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.31.04
2.      Albidah, A., Abadel, A., Alrshoudi, F., Altheeb, A., Abbas, H., & Al-Salloum, Y. (2020). Bond strength between concrete substrate and metakaolin geopolymer repair mortars at ambient and elevated temperatures. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 9(5), 10732-10745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.092
3.      Asteris, P., Naseri, H., Hajihassani, M., Kharghani, M., & Chalioris, C. (2021). On the mechanical characteristics of fiber reinforced polymer concrete. Advances in Concrete Construction, 12, 271-282. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2021.12.4.271
4.      ASTM. (n.d.). C33/C33M-16: Standard specification for concrete aggregates.
5.      ASTM. (n.d.). C39/C39M-05: Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.
6.      ASTM. (n.d.). C150-07: Standard specification for Portland cement.
7.      ASTM. (n.d.). C1583/C1583M: Standard test method for tensile strength of concrete surfaces and the bond strength or tensile strength of concrete repair and overlay materials by direct tension (pull-off method).
8.      ASTM. (n.d.). C496/C496M: Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.
9.      ASTM. (n.d.). C882/C882M: Standard test method for bond strength of epoxy-resin systems used with concrete by slant shear.
10.   Ayub, T., Shafiq, N., & Nuruddin, M. F. (2014). Mechanical properties of high-performance concrete reinforced with basalt fibers. Procedia Engineering, 77, 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.029
11.   Bentz, D. P., et al. (2018). Influence of substrate moisture state and roughness on interface microstructure and bond strength: Slant shear vs. pull-off testing. Cement and Concrete Composites, 87, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.12.005
12.   Biswas, R., & Rai, B. (2020). Effect of cementing efficiency factor on the mechanical properties of concrete incorporating silica fume. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, 5(3), 190-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2020.1765269
13.   Cao, M., Alkayem, N. F., Pan, L., & Novák, D. (2016). Advanced methods in neural networks-based sensitivity analysis with their applications in civil engineering. In Artificial neural networks - Models and applications. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/64026
14.   Cihan, M. T. (2019). Prediction of concrete compressive strength and slump by machine learning methods. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3069046
15.   Courard, L., Piotrowski, T., & Garbacz, A. (2014). Near-to-surface properties affecting bond strength in concrete repair. Cement and Concrete Composites, 46, 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.11.005
16.   Dushimimana, A., Niyonsenga, A. A., & Nzamurambaho, F. (2021). A review on strength development of high performance concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 307, Article 124865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124865
17.   Fahmy, A. S., El-Madawy, M. E.-T., & Gobran, Y. A. (2016). Using artificial neural networks in the design of orthotropic bridge decks. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55(4), 3195-3203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.06.034
18.   Fakharifar, M., Dalvand, A., Arezoumandi, M., Sharbatdar, M. K., Chen, G., & Kheyroddin, A. (2014). Mechanical properties of high performance fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Construction and Building Materials, 71, 510-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.068
19.   Garbacz, A., Courard, L., & Kostana, K. (2006). Characterization of concrete surface roughness and its relation to adhesion in repair systems. Materials Characterization, 56(4-5), 281-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2005.10.014
20.   Guo, T., Weng, X., Liu, C., Yu, Q., Zhang, C., & Li, Y. (2020). Evaluation of the bonding and fatigue properties of an innovative rapid repair structure for concrete pavement. Construction and Building Materials, 235, Article 117484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117484
21.   Haque, M., Ray, S., Mita, A. F., Bhattacharjee, S., & Shams, M. J. B. (2021). Prediction and optimization of the fresh and hardened properties of concrete containing rice husk ash and glass fiber using response surface methodology. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 14, Article e00505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00505
22.   Hasan, N. Md. S., et al. (2022). Integration of rice husk ash as supplementary cementitious material in the production of sustainable high-strength concrete. Materials, 15(22), 8171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15228171
23.   He, Y., Zhang, X., Hooton, R. D., & Zhang, X. (2017). Effects of interface roughness and interface adhesion on new-to-old concrete bonding. Construction and Building Materials, 151, 582-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.049
24.   Hu, C., & Li, Z. (2015). Property investigation of individual phases in cementitious composites containing silica fume and fly ash. Cement and Concrete Composites, 57, 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.011
25.   Jamali, M., & Gupta, S. (2023). Utilization of silica fume with fly ash and properties of Portland cement-silica fume-fly ash-concrete. In [Conference proceedings] (p. 020025). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0119884
26.   Janowska-Renkas, E., Jakiel, P., Fabianowski, D., & Matyjaszczyk, D. (2021). Optimal selection of high-performance concrete for post-tensioned girder bridge using advanced hybrid MCDA method. Materials, 14(21), 6553. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216553
27.   Júlio, E. N. B. S., Branco, F. A. B., & Silva, V. D. (2005). Concrete-to-concrete bond strength: Influence of an epoxy-based bonding agent on a roughened substrate surface. Magazine of Concrete Research, 57(8), 463-468. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2005.57.8.463
28.   Katzer, J., & Domski, J. (2012). Quality and mechanical properties of engineered steel fibres used as reinforcement for concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 34, 243-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.058
29.   Kekez, S., & Krzywoń, R. (2022). Prediction of bonding strength of externally bonded SRP composites using artificial neural networks. Materials, 15(4), 1314. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15041314
30.   Khademi, F., Akbari, M., Jamal, S. M., & Nikoo, M. (2017). Multiple linear regression, artificial neural network, and fuzzy logic prediction of 28 days compressive strength of concrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 11(1), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0363-9
31.   Kohoutková, A., & Broukalová, I. (2013). Optimization of fibre reinforced concrete structural members. Procedia Engineering, 65, 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.018
32.   Krose, B., & van der Smagt, P. (1996). An introduction to neural networks. University of Amsterdam.
33.   Lantsoght, E. (2019). Database of shear experiments on steel fiber reinforced concrete beams without stirrups. Materials, 12(6), 917. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060917
34.   Li, C., Mei, X., Dias, D., Cui, Z., & Zhou, J. (2023). Compressive strength prediction of rice husk ash concrete using a hybrid artificial neural network model. Materials, 16(8), 3135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16083135
35.   Marcalíková, Z., & Čajka, R. (2022). Numerical modeling and diagnostic of FRC slab under centric and eccentric load. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 18(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2022-0002
36.   Matos, M. A. S., Pinho, S. T., & Tagarielli, V. L. (2019). Application of machine learning to predict the multiaxial strain-sensing response of CNT-polymer composites. Carbon, 146, 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.001
37.   Pezeshkian, M., Delnavaz, A., & Delnavaz, M. (2021). Development of UHPC mixtures using natural zeolite and glass sand as replacements of silica fume and quartz sand. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 25(11), 2023-2038. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2019.1610074
38.   Rahman, S. K., & Al-Ameri, R. (2021). Experimental investigation and artificial neural network based prediction of bond strength in self-compacting geopolymer concrete reinforced with basalt FRP bars. Applied Sciences, 11(11), 4889. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11114889
39.   Rashid, K., et al. (2020). Experimental investigation of the bond strength between new to old concrete using different adhesive layers. Construction and Building Materials, 249, Article 118798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118798
40.   Rodrigues, A. L. M. V., Mendes, Á. Á. F., Gomes, V., Battagin, A. F., Saade, M. R. M., & Da Silva, M. G. (2022). Environmental and mechanical evaluation of blended cements with high mineral admixture content. Frontiers in Materials, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.880986
41.   Sadowski, Ł., Stefaniuk, D., & Hoła, J. (2017). The effect of the porosity within the interfacial zone between layers on pull-off adhesion. Construction and Building Materials, 152, 887-897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.080
42.   Salas Montoya, A., Chung, C.-W., & Kim, J.-H. (2023). High performance concretes with highly reactive rice husk ash and silica fume. Materials, 16(11), 3903. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16113903
43.   Sadrmomtazi, A., & Khoshkbijari, R. K. (2019). Determination and prediction of bonding strength of polymer modified concrete (PMC) as the repair overlay on the conventional concrete substrate. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 23(3), 1141-1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0113-3
44.   Samantaray, S. (2019). Study of combined effect of metakaolin and steel fiber on mechanical properties of concrete. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 27(3), 1381-1396.
45.   Shin, J., Scott, D. W., Stewart, L. K., & Jeon, J.-S. (2020). Multi-hazard assessment and mitigation for seismically-deficient RC building frames using artificial neural network models. Engineering Structures, 207, Article 110204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110204
46.   Soylev, T. A., & François, R. (2003). Quality of steel-concrete interface and corrosion of reinforcing steel. Cement and Concrete Research, 33(9), 1407-1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00087-5
47.   Wang, D., & Jia, H. (2022). A quantitative study on the synergistic effect between limestone powder and supplementary cementitious materials. Advances in Cement Research, 34(7), 324-330. https://doi.org/10.1680/jadcr.21.00027
48.   Wang, D., Ju, Y., Shen, H., & Xu, L. (2019). Mechanical properties of high performance concrete reinforced with basalt fiber and polypropylene fiber. Construction and Building Materials, 197, 464-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.181
49.   Wang, W., Shen, A., Lyu, Z., He, Z., & Nguyen, K. T. Q. (2021). Fresh and rheological characteristics of fiber reinforced concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 296, Article 123734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123734
50.   Wu, Z., Shi, C., Khayat, K. H., & Xie, L. (2018). Effect of SCM and nano-particles on static and dynamic mechanical properties of UHPC. Construction and Building Materials, 182, 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.126
51.   Xu, L., Yao, Y., Li, Y., Su, J., & Wu, Y. (2023). Review of the interfacial bonding properties between ultrahigh-performance concrete and normal concrete. Applied Sciences, 13(11), 6697. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13116697
52.   Yazdankhah, A., Mosleh, A., Manjily, F. P., & Razzaghi, M. S. (2022). Seismic fragility analysis of RC continuous girder bridges using artificial neural network. Winter & Spring 2022.
53.   Yosefi, A., & Jahangir, H. (2023). The influence of natural additives on mechanical properties of concrete specimens: A review. 5, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.22034/CPJ.2023.398231.1200
54.   Zhang, X., Zhao, S., Liu, Z., & Wang, F. (2019). Utilization of steel slag in ultra-high performance concrete with enhanced eco-friendliness. Construction and Building Materials, 214, 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.106
55.   Zhao, J., Liang, J., Chu, L., & Shen, F. (2018). Experimental study on shear behavior of steel fiber reinforced concrete beams with high-strength reinforcement. Materials, 11(9), 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11091682