مقایسه تطبیقی شاخص‌های زیست پذیری محلات ناکارآمد راه‌ری و آخوند شهر قزوین بر اساس روش F’ANP

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
ملیحه باباخانی 1
وحیده حسینعلی 2
سهیل قشلاق پور 3
مجید زارعی 4
1 استادیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی (ره)، قزوین، ایران
2 کارشناسی ارشد برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه، بین الملل امام خمینی(ره)، قزوین، ایران.
3 پژوهشگر دکتری شهرسازی، پردیس هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
4 دانشیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی(ره)، قزوین، ایران.
10.22034/he.2025.520179.1096
چکیده
محله‌های قدیمی و فرسوده یکی از مهمترین مشکلات شهرنشینی امروزی به شمار می روند، بطوریکه در دهه‌های اخیر پدیده تنزل کیفیت محیط‌زیست آنها، پایداری شهرها را به خطر انداخته است. این بافت‌ها هسته‌های قدیمی شهرها هستند و به مرور زمان فرسوده و ناکارآمد شده اند و یا در دوران معاصر بدون رعایت ضوابط و مقررات معماری و شهرسازی شکل گرفته اند و با مشکلات جسمی، اجتماعی و اقتصادی زیادی روبرو هستند. تنزل شاخص‌های کیفی در فضاهای شهری این محلات یکی از معضلات متعددی است که این مناطق شهری با آن دست و پنجه نرم می کنند و از آنجاکه فضاهای شهری، اوج تجلی فضایی زندگی شهری و حضور شهروندان را نشان می دهد، تاثیر متقابل کاهش کیفیت فضاهای شهری بر تنزل زیست پذیری شهری، عمق و ابعاد این معضل در محلات قدیمی و فرسوده را روشن‌تر میسازد. لذا هدف تحقیق حاضر بررسی تطبیقی و مقایسه شاخص های زیست‌پذیری در محلات ناکارآمد راه‌ری و آخوند بوده است. این پژوهش به لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و ازنظر فرایندی، توصیفی-تحلیلی و ازنظر داده کمی وکیفی (ترکیبی) می‌باشد. برای بررسی تطبیقی دو محله با هم (ذی صلاح) از آزمون  F'ANP استفاده شد. نتایج حاکی از کیفیت نازل عوامل اتصال‌پذیری و یکپارچگی بافت شهری بوده که این عدم دید و دسترسی به برخی از فضا‌های شهری باعث ایجاد فضا‌های بی‌دفاع  و مشکلات متعدد شده است. نتایج تحقیق حاکی از آن بود که بعد اقتصادی در محله آخوند (55/0) و در محله راه‌ری (45/0)، بعد اجتماعی در محله آخوند (966/0) و در محله راه‌ری (51/0)، بعد کالبدی در محله آخوند (62/0) و در محله راه‌ری (37/0)، بعد زیست‌محیطی در محله آخوند (48/0) و در محله راه‌ری (52/0) و در نهایت بعد مدیریتی در محله آخوند (48/0) و در محله راه‌ری (52/0) بدست آمد. علاوه بر این در تحلیل با دیمتل، عوامل ایمنی و امنیت (115/0)، تأسیسات و تجهیزات شهری (097/0) و اشتغال و درآمد (078/0) بیشترین تأثیر را بر سایر مؤلفه‌ها داشتند و در نهایت پس از مطالعات تطبیقی، محله آخوند با وزن 62/0 شرایط بهتری نسبت به محله راه ری با وزن 476/0 داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Analysis of livability indicators of inefficient neighborhoods based on the F'ANP method (Case study: Rah-Rey and Akhund neighborhoods of Qazvin city)

نویسندگان English

Maliheh Babakhani 1
Vahideh Hosein Ali 2
Soheil Gheshlaghpoor 3
Majid Zarei 4
1 Assistant Professor Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin , Iran.
2 Master of Urban Planning, , Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,, Iran.
3 PhD Student at Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
4 Associated Professor Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin , Iran.
چکیده English

Old and dilapidated neighborhoods are one of the most important problems of today's urbanization, as the degradation of their environmental quality in recent decades has jeopardized the sustainability of cities. These textures are the old cores of cities and have become worn out and inefficient over time, or have been formed in the contemporary era without observing architectural and urban planning rules and regulations, and are facing many physical, social, and economic problems. The decline in quality indicators in urban spaces in these neighborhoods is one of the many problems that these urban areas are struggling with. Since urban spaces represent the peak of spatial manifestation of urban life and the presence of citizens, the reciprocal effect of the decline in the quality of urban spaces on the decline in urban livability makes the depth and dimensions of this problem in old and dilapidated neighborhoods clearer. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to conduct a comparative study and compare the livability indicators in the inefficient neighborhoods of Rahi Ray and Akhund. This research is applied in terms of purpose, descriptive-analytical in terms of process, and quantitative and qualitative (combined) in terms of data. The F'ANP test was used to compare two neighborhoods (Zhi Salah). The results indicate the low quality of connectivity and integration factors of the urban fabric, especially within the fabric, and this lack of visibility and access to some urban spaces has caused problems and defenseless spaces. The results of the research indicated that the economic dimension was obtained in Akhund neighborhood (0.55) and in Rah-Re neighborhood (0.45), in the social dimension in Akhund neighborhood (0.966) and in Rah-Re neighborhood (0.51), in the physical dimension in Akhund neighborhood (0.62) and in Rah-Re neighborhood (0.37), in the environmental dimension in Akhund neighborhood (0.48) and in Rah-Re neighborhood (0.52), and finally in the managerial dimension in Akhund neighborhood (0.48) and in Rah-Re neighborhood (0.52). In addition, in the analysis with DEMETL, the factors of safety and security (0.115), urban facilities and equipment (0.097), and employment and income (0.078) had the greatest impact on other components, and finally, after comparative studies, Akhund neighborhood with a weight of 0.62 had better conditions than Rah-e Ray neighborhood with a weight of 0.476.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sustainable development
Inefficient texture
Livability
F'
ANP method
Akhund and Rah-Ray neighborhoods of Ghazvin
  1. Akbari, N., Moayedfar, R., & Khondabi, F. M. (2018). Analyzing livability in the distressed areas of Isfahan city with an emphasis on city development strategy. Journal of urban economics and management, 6(21), 37-54.
  2. Akbari, M., Sarrafi, M., Razaviyan, M. T., & Talebian, M. H. (2020). Effects of Livability of Street on Urban Tourism Sustainability: The Case Study of Valiasr Street, Tehran. Journal of Tourism and Development, 9(3), 61-73.
  3. Asiabanipour, E., Panahi, A., & Ahmadzadeh, H. (2021). Assessment and evaluation of the objective indicators of urban livability in district of Tabriz metropolitan. Human Geography Research, 53(2), 545-565.
  4. Alavi, Seyed Ali; Ebrahimi, Mohammad; Najafpour Mohammadabad, Bahman; Khalidi, Abdollah. (2016). Assessing the vulnerability of Minab city's dilapidated fabric to earthquakes. Crisis Management. 9, 71-82.
  5. Bromley, R. D., Tallon, A. R., & Thomas, C. J. (2005). City centre regeneration through residential development: Contributing to sustainability. Urban studies, 42(13), 2407-2429.‏
  6. Babaei Eliasi, M., Karmi Palengari, S., Nakhjavani, S., & Mohammadpour, S. (2025). Investigating the effectiveness of urban prosperity on urban livability (case study: Rasht metropolis). Journal of Geography and Planning.
  7. Ellis, P. and M. Roberts (2016). "Leveraging Urbanization in South Asia: Managing Spatial Transformation for Prosperity and Livability", World Bank Group, Washington, DC. ww.worldbank.org.
  8. Everitt BS, Dun G. (2010) Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. Edward Arnold, London.
  9. Embry, Margaret.(2009). Designing Community: The Application of New Urban Principles to Create Authentic Communities, University of South Florida Scholar Commons.
  10. Godschalk, D.R (2004)” land use planning challenges with conflicts visions of sustainable development and livable communites.
  11. Gheshlaghpoor, Soheil, and Moqbel, Masoumeh. (2021). Evaluating the trend of changes in urban green space coverage using landscape metrics (case study: Qazvin city). Scientific Research Journal of Rangeland and Watershed Management, 74(3), 663-676.
  12. Heydari, T.(2016): Assessment livability of deteriorated fabrics' (Case Study: Zanjan city’s) Doctoral dissertation on Geography and Urban Planning, with the guidance of Dr. Ali Shamaei, School of Geography, Kharazmi University.
  13. Helleman, G., & Wassenberg, F. (2004). The renewal of what was tomorrow’s idealistic city. Amsterdam’s Bijlmermeer high-rise. Cities, 21(1), 3-17.‏
  14. Hoseinzadeh, R., Safaralizadeh, E., & Khabbazi, H. (2021). Assessing the Livability of Urban Neighborhoods in the Direction of Sustainable Development, from the Perspective of Citizens, Case Study: Shahre Kohne and Seyed Morteza in Kashmar City.
  15. Hadavi, Faramarz; Pourahmad, Ahmad; Keshavarz, Mahnaz and Ali Akbari, Esmaeil. (2017). Sustainable Regeneration of Inefficient Urban Textures (Case Study: District 10 of Tehran). Quarterly Journal of Environmental Planning. 37, 167-194.
  16. Jacobs, A., & Appleyard, D. (2011). “Toward an Urban Design Manifesto”: Journal of the American Planning Association (1987). In The City Reader (pp. 574-585). Routledge.
  17. Jannati, H., Esteghlal, A., Almodaresi, A., Rezaei, M. R., & Zakerian, M. (2021). Comparative assessment of the sustainable livability in urban neighborhoods: A case study of the neighborhood of the oil company staff and Sadatshahr in the city of Dogonbadan. The Journal of Geographical Research on Desert Areas, 8(2), 161-185.
  18. Kytta, M., A,Broberg and M. Haybatollahi (2016). "Urban Happiness: Contextsensitive Study of the Social Sustainability of Urban Settings", Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 43 (1).
  19. Kashef, M. (2016). Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5(2), 239-253.‏
  20. Liu, J., Nijkamp, P., Huang, X., & Lin, D. (2017). Urban livability and tourism development in China: Analysis of sustainable development by means of spatial panel data. Habitat international, 68, 99-107.‏
  21. Larice, M,Z (2005), “great neighborhoods: the livability and morphology high density neighborhoods in urban north America”, PHD.
  22. Mccrea, Rod.,Walters, Peter. (2012) Impacts of Urban Consolidation on Urban Liveability: Comparing an Inner and Outer Suburb in Brisbane, Australia, Jurnal Housing, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp 190-206.
  23. Mehdizadeh, Ahmadi; Ghader, Pakdel Fard and Faramarzi Asl, Mahsa. (2012). A comparative study of the vulnerability of the checkered and semi-checkered texture of Salmas city to earthquakes from the perspective of passive defense. Quarterly Journal of Urban Studies. 43, 15-26.
  24. Ouyang, W., B. Wang, L. Tian and X. Niu (2017). "Spatial Deprivation of Urban Public Services in Migrant Enclaves Under the Context of a Rapidly Urbanizing China: An Evaluation Based on Suburban Shanghai", Cities, Vol. 60.
  25. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2011). "City Life: Rankings (Livability)Versus Perceptions(Satisfaction)", Social Indicators Research, 110)2).
  26. Onnom, W., Tripathi, N., Nitivattananon, V., & Ninsawat, S. (2018). Development of a liveable city index (LCI) using multi criteria geospatial modelling for medium class cities in developing countries. Sustainability, 10(2), 520.‏
  27. Ruth, M., & Franklin, R. S. (2014) Livability for all Conceptual limits and practical implications. Applied Geography, Vol.49, pp.18-23.
  28. Schomberg, Y., Polakit, K., & Prosperi, D. (2011). Spatial partitioning of livability indices: South Florida case study. na.‏
  29. Sasanpour, F., Alizadeh, S., & Moghadam, H. A. (2018). Investigating the feasibility of Urumia urban areas livability using RALSPI model. Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences, 18(48), 241-258.
  30. Sepahian, Abdolsalam, Mollashahi, & Karimian Bostani. (2025). Urban livability towards sustainable development; Saravan city study. Green development management studies.
  31. Tan, K. G., Nie, T., & Baek, S. (2016). Empirical assessment on the liveability of cities in the Greater China Region. Competitiveness Review, 26(1), 2-24.‏
  32. Wheeler Stephen,M.(2013).Planning for Sustainability Creating Livable, Equitable and Ecological Communities, Published:Routledge.
  33. Xiao, Y., Chai, J., Wang, R., & Huang, H. (2022). Assessment and key factors of urban liveability in underdeveloped regions: A case study of the Loess Plateau, China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 79, 103674.
  34. Zhan, D., M.P. Kwan, W. Zhang, J. Fan, J. Yu and Y. Dang (2018). "Assessment and Determinants of Satisfaction With Urban Livability in China", Cities, Vol. 79.
  35. Zebardast, E. (2014). Application of F’ANP in urban planning. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 19(2), 23-38
اکولوژی انسانی
دوره 4، شماره 11
تابستان 1404
صفحه 920-941