Analysis of Factors Influencing Farmers’ Behavior Toward Willingness to Pay for the Development of Sustainable Agricultural Technologies (A Case Study of Farmers in Lorestan Province)

Articles in Press

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Nooshin Osooli
Department of Agriculture, Khor.C., Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran.
10.22034/he.2026.566172.1181
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors influencing farmers’ behavior regarding their willingness to pay (WTP) for the development of sustainable agricultural technologies, with a case study of farmers in Lorestan Province, Iran. This research was descriptive–correlational and employed a field survey method. Data were collected from a sample of 430 wheat and rice farmers in five counties (Khorramabad, Borujerd, Aligudarz, Dorud, and Kuhdasht), selected through stratified random sampling. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire based on the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Data were analyzed using binary logit and probit econometric models. The results indicated that, on average, 41.9% of farmers in Lorestan Province were willing to pay for pressurized irrigation technology. Findings from the logistic regression model showed that access to financial credit (odds ratio = 2.44) and direct experience of drought (odds ratio = 2.83) were the strongest positive predictors of willingness to pay. In addition, perceived behavioral control (perceived technical capability), positive attitude, and membership in water user cooperatives were identified as other significant positive determinants. Conversely, increasing age had a significant and negative effect on farmers’ willingness to pay. These results emphasize the importance of integrating financial support mechanisms, practical training programs to reduce technology-related apprehension, and targeted interventions in drought-prone areas when designing policies for the development and extension of sustainable agricultural technologies in Lorestan Province.

Keywords

Subjects

1.      استانداری لرستان، دفتر برنامه‌ریزی.(1398).طرح جامع آب استان لرستان. خرم‌آباد.
2.      افشاری، ز،. آجیلی، ع،. رضایی مقدم، ک،. و بیژنی، م .(1391). بررسی نگرش های پایداری در بین کشاورزان پنبه کار استان اصفهان. تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران،42(3):423-431.
3.      باقری، ا،. و شاهپسند، م. ر.(1389). بررسی نگرش کشاورزان سیب زمینی کار دشت اردبیل نسبت به عملیات کشاورزی پایدار. مجله تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران، 41(1):231-242.
4.      دفتر حقوقی و مقررات معاونت حقوقی ریاست جمهوری.(1394). سیاست‌های کلی محیط زیست. ابلاغی از سوی مقام معظم رهبری.
5.      سازمان حفاظت محیط زیست.(1399).گزارش وضعیت محیط زیست ایران. تهران.
6.      ستاد ملی سازگاری با کم‌آبی.(1397).سند ملی سازگاری با کم‌آبی. مصوب هیئت وزیران.
7.      شرکت مدیریت منابع آب ایران .(1400). گزارش وضعیت آب کشور در سال آبی ۹۹-۱۴۰۰.تهران
8.      کیانی، غ. ح،. و لیاقتی، ه.(1386). تحلیل شرایط اقتصادی تبدیل کشاورزی رایج به کشاورزی ارگانیک با استفاده از مدل برنامه ریزی خطی پویا. دومین همایش ملی کشاورزی بوم شناختی ایران، گرگان. صفحه .2727-2737.
9.      Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
10.   Arunrat, N., et al. (2021). Farmers’ intention and decision to adapt to climate change: A case study in the Nam River Basin of Thailand. Climate Risk Management, 32, 100300.
11.    
12.   Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340
13.   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (Various Years). Reports on Technology Transfer and Sustainable Agriculture. http://www.fao.org
14.   Fuentes. M. (2016). Saba, v. explaining ocean warming: causes,scale, effects and consequences: iucn: gland, switzerlan,2016:pp289-302.
15.   Krishna, V. V., & Veettil, P. C. (2020). Risk preferences and the adoption of climate-smart agriculture: Evidence from India. Agricultural Systems, 184, 102905.
16.   Liu, T., et al. (2018). The influence of social capital on farmers’ willingness to adopt low-carbon agricultural technology: Evidence from Jiangsu, China. Ecological Economics, 150, 294-303.
17.   Ma, W., & Wang, X. (2020). Internet use and sustainable agricultural consumption: Evidence from rural China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 12(1), 1-19.
18.   Mugandani, R., et al. (2022). Determinants of smallholder farmers’ willingness to pay for sustainable agricultural practices in Zimbabwe. Sustainability, 14(3), 1785.
19.   Naderi Mahdei K., Hosseini, S.M. Aazami M. & Saadi H. (2010). Administrative Feasibility of Monitoring Mechanisms Implementation for Sustainable Agriculture, American Journal of Applied Sciences 7 (2): 208-21
20.    
21.   Rezaei, R., et al. (2019). Modeling farmers’ intention to use pesticide safe behaviors: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Environmental Management, 248, 109292.
22.   Truelove, H. B., et al. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127-138
23.   World Bank. (2021). Iran Economic Monitor: Mitigation and Adaptation to Climate Change: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/iran/publication/economic-monitor-fall-2021.
Human Ecology

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 21 January 2026